Using one of the ownet programs (connecting directly to owserver) seems like
the best approach.
Paul Alfille
On 2/8/07, Mark Cheeseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A couple of months ago, Paul Alfille wrote:
>
> Also, is there interest in an OWFS - OWW bridge? My thought is to use
> owserver as
A couple of months ago, Paul Alfille wrote:
>
> Also, is there interest in an OWFS - OWW bridge? My thought is to use
> owserver as the backend and OWW for weather-specific applications.
> That would allow both systems to access the 1-wire bus simultaneously.
>
(I've only just joined the list)
Y
Jerry Scharf wrote:
> Paul Alfille wrote:
>> OWW problems, any thoughts?
>>
>> Also, is there interest in an OWFS - OWW bridge? My thought is to use
>> owserver as the backend and OWW for weather-specific applications.
>> That would allow both systems to access the 1-wire bus simultaneously.
>>
>
Paul Alfille wrote:
> OWW problems, any thoughts?
>
> Also, is there interest in an OWFS - OWW bridge? My thought is to use
> owserver as the backend and OWW for weather-specific applications.
> That would allow both systems to access the 1-wire bus simultaneously.
>
> Paul Alfille
>
Paul,
I wou
maybe using owserver --oww could allow new files into right devices
for example (i don't have weather station)
owserver don't allow wind direction FILES
owserver --oww allow wind direction FILES
Roberto Spadim
Paul Alfille escreveu:
> OWW problems, any thoughts?
>
> Also, is there interest in an
OWW problems, any thoughts?
Also, is there interest in an OWFS - OWW bridge? My thought is to use
owserver as the backend and OWW for weather-specific applications. That
would allow both systems to access the 1-wire bus simultaneously.
Paul Alfille
-- Forwarded message --
From: