Re: [Owfs-developers] Hardware question: DS2438

2007-10-17 Thread Paul Alfille
On 10/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm sorry to keep asking hardware questions on the owfs-software-dev list, > but I don't know where else to ask these things. > Hardware questions are fine. Encouraged, even. -

Re: [Owfs-developers] Hardware question: DS2438

2007-10-17 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Why do all (that I've found) light-measuring circuits based on the DS2438 > use reverse-biased photodiodes, rather than, say, a photoresistor? I've tried that. Turns out that the typical photoresistor has too large a resistance range, so you have a choice between "no diff

Re: [Owfs-developers] Hardware question: DS2438

2007-10-17 Thread njh
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Why do all (that I've found) light-measuring circuits based on the DS2438 > use reverse-biased photodiodes, rather than, say, a photoresistor? Either > way you could have a fixed sense resistor between the Vs+ and Vs- > terminals. No idea, but I jus

[Owfs-developers] Hardware question: DS2438

2007-10-17 Thread katana
I'm sorry to keep asking hardware questions on the owfs-software-dev list, but I don't know where else to ask these things. Why do all (that I've found) light-measuring circuits based on the DS2438 use reverse-biased photodiodes, rather than, say, a photoresistor? Either way you could have a fixe