Hello Paul,
> A quick patch for module/owlib/src/c/ow_browse_monitor.c:
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ static GOOD_OR_BAD browse_in_use(const struct connection_in
> * in_selected) ;
> /* Device-specific functions */
> GOOD_OR_BAD Browse_detect(struct port_in *pin)
> {
> +#if OW_ZERO
> struct connecti
ry 06, 2015 9:28 PM
> *To:* brucek ; OWFS (One-wire file system)
> discussion and help
> *Subject:* Re: [Owfs-developers] New Release 2.9p9
>
> I think the file upload was a little flakey. Did it a couple times more
> and now I see the files listed. Sorry for the premature ann
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 9:28 PM
To: brucek ; OWFS (One-wire file system) discussion and help
Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] New Release 2.9p9
I think the file upload was a little flakey. Did it a couple times more and now
I see the files listed. Sorry for the premature announcement.
On
d, and an empty owfs/2.9p9 folder.
> As always, thanks for keeping this going
> Bruce
>
> *From:* Paul Alfille
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 06, 2015 8:59 AM
> *To:* owfs-developers
> *Subject:* [Owfs-developers] New Release 2.9p9
>
> Minor improvement -- basical
Hey Paul,
As of 2pm EST I still do not see 2.9p9 on Sourceforge, just the 2.9p8 download,
and an empty owfs/2.9p9 folder.
As always, thanks for keeping this going
Bruce
From: Paul Alfille
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 8:59 AM
To: owfs-developers
Subject: [Owfs-developers] New Release 2.9p9
Hello again Paul,
Just wondering, how come the project has McAfee_8.7Home.exe in the project root
directory on Sourceforge? And only 7 bytes? seems just a little suspect...
Bruce
From: Paul Alfille
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 8:59 AM
To: owfs-developers
Subject: [Owfs-developers] New
Hello Paul,
on sourceforge.net is no file for download the 2.9p9 available.
Best regards,
Roland
From: Paul Alfille
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 2:59 PM
To: owfs-developers
Subject: [Owfs-developers] New Release 2.9p9
Minor improvement -- basically fixes the owfs problem for Markus
Minor improvement -- basically fixes the owfs problem for Markus Gaugusch's
report:
"cat: temperature: Message too long"
The problem is that some tools (like cat) ask for an arbitrary (but large)
read to gather all the data. It used to be 64K but now seems to be 128K
which passes some internal li
