On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:57 PM, wrote:
> Errors with more than 4 adapters doesnt annoy me, i will use in one owfs
> process maximum 2. The communication between 15 "owfses" :) will be made by
> "highlevel" application. And more high-level will be linux-mce on separete
> server. 15 owfses is exac
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:57 PM, wrote:
> >So if you check the bus.x contents after startup, and select the mapping
> you like, it should stay consistent for that run of OWFS.
>
>
>
> Seems i need to mount it twice..
>
> It sounds like you want to use the filesystem interface (rather than the
net
>So if you check the bus.x contents after startup, and select the mapping you
>like, it should stay consistent for that run of OWFS.
Seems i need to mount it twice..
The setup of system must be easy:
1. I set in config one "known" 1W device, it must be a +5V sensor with led. I
specify how mu
Hi!
I did a quick test setup with 4 adapters.
This is how the devices are spread among the adapters:
1. 1xDS18S20, 1xLCD (Louis Swartz)
2. 9xDS18S20
3. 1xDS18S20, 2x DS2423P
4. 2xDS2413, 1xLCD (Louis Swartz)
To generate the error I simply run:
"watch grep . 10*/temperature"
in the uncached dir
Sounds like this should get fixed!
I can probably find 4 adapters. How many devices on each?
Can you send me a log file (error_level=9) so I can try to see where the
problem occurs?
Paul Alfille
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Erik Freiholtz wrote:
> Paul Alfille skrev:
> >
> >
> > >OWFS
Paul Alfille skrev:
>
>
> >OWFS handles multiple adapters seemlessly. There is no specified
> limit on the number, but I haven't tried 10-15. You can also
> partition the master among multiple machines, or multiple
> instances of owserver on the same machine. The overhead is minimal
>
>
> >OWFS handles multiple adapters seemlessly. There is no specified limit on
> the number, but I haven't tried 10-15. You can also partition the master
> among multiple machines, or multiple instances of owserver on the same
> machine. The overhead is minimal.
>
>
>
> So the answer is - yes, OW
>There are solenoid drivers and the like with 1-wire control. There are also
>published designs for 1-wire SLAVES based on the PIC micro. Search the
>developer's list archives.
http://www.mail-archive.com/owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00667.html
http://www.sq-1.com/sctoc.html
Yes,
s I've seen at least enough bad implementations
> to say this should take more than tonight ;)
>
> regards Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Paul Alfille [mailto:paul.alfi...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 12:38 AM
> > To: owfs-develop
Paul, just to follow up:
I fully agree with you keeping the naming-structure of owfs in the
SNMP-presentation. It's good and it also fits..
We're going to to create a proof of concept in Perl as net-snmp module now,
will get back when we have results.
>
> Submitted.
>
Great ;) Will adopt as
ations
> to say this should take more than tonight ;)
>
> regards Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Alfille [mailto:paul.alfi...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 12:38 AM
> > To: owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> >
e-
> From: Paul Alfille [mailto:paul.alfi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 12:38 AM
> To: owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] OWFS & SNMP
>
> I can program in C, but SNMP seems rather forbidding.
> Specifically, how the rea
I can program in C, but SNMP seems rather forbidding. Specifically, how the
readings would be presented.
I found this example from ora-ltd:
http://www.ora-ltd.com/microweb/mib.html(The MIB is
http://www.ora-ltd.com/microweb/MTECH-DSTEMP-MIB.mib)
I assume we would used the owfs names (i.e. temper
Hi,
are there any news on this topic ?
I'm currently after getting my temperatures available by SNMP and played around
a bit with extending net-snmp by using a perl agent and "pass" to a
shellscript. Works but still much to do..
Just wanted to ask wether there are any things going on in this di
14 matches
Mail list logo
