iting them back.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jan
Kandziora
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 8:37 AM
To: owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] Performance
Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2005 04:57 schrieb Paul Al
Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2005 04:57 schrieb Paul Alfille:
> I've written up my testing of OWFS performance.
>
Great. Many thanks for the data, Paul.
If I understand correctly, it cost about 20ms to check if a device is present
on the bus (list process). Does it have the same cost to read or change a
Paul,
Thanks for the information. I had a couple questions:
First, do you know what causes the 4 second elapsed time on the bare bus?
Second, can you try the experiment with a write to the simultaneous flag
and then read back? That's a better look at the bus traffic time compared
to the conve
I've written up my testing of OWFS performance.
Basically, Caching wins
Owserver is free
Remote is fast
Serial is slower.
http://owfs.sourceforge.net/performance.html
Paul
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strate
