Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: current CVS version broken!

2005-08-02 Thread Paul Alfille
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 12:54 pm, Sven Geggus wrote: > > OK, works again with the current CVS-Version. > > How is this supposed to work? > > owserver -p :::4711 -u --foreground > > Is this correct, doing a bind to any local IP in the IPv4 or IPv6 domain? > The algorithm is 1. If no ":" in address

[Owfs-developers] Re: current CVS version broken!

2005-08-02 Thread Sven Geggus
Paul Alfille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if these are independent problems. I don't this Serg Oskin (the > OWTCL implementor and maintainer) has made any changes recently. OK, works again with the current CVS-Version. How is this supposed to work? owserver -p :::4711 -u --foreground

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: current CVS version broken!

2005-08-01 Thread Paul Alfille
On Sunday 31 July 2005 07:28 pm, Christian Magnusson wrote: > I think I found the problem.. I have probably been tired or something > when adding a row in ow_net.c which clears AI_PASSIVE. > The cvs is unreachable for me right now, so could somebody > else checkin the patch later? > > > diff --excl

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: current CVS version broken!

2005-07-31 Thread Christian Magnusson
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 21:57, Paul Alfille wrote: > On Sunday 31 July 2005 03:27 pm, Paul Alfille wrote: > > No change was intended. Sounds like a new bug. > > > > Paul > > > > On Sunday 31 July 2005 06:35 am, Sven Geggus wrote: > > > Christian Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You might

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: current CVS version broken!

2005-07-31 Thread Christian Magnusson
I think I found the problem.. I have probably been tired or something when adding a row in ow_net.c which clears AI_PASSIVE. The cvs is unreachable for me right now, so could somebody else checkin the patch later? diff --exclude '*Entries' -ruw cvs/owfs/module/owlib/src/c/ow_net.c owfs/module/ow

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: current CVS version broken!

2005-07-31 Thread Paul Alfille
On Sunday 31 July 2005 06:45 am, Sven Geggus wrote: > Christian Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think it listens on 127.0.0.1:5005 as default if you only type > > "-p 5005", that makes owserver unreachable for remote hosts. Then > > you have to connect with "owhttpd -p 8080 -s 127.0.0.1:

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: current CVS version broken!

2005-07-31 Thread Paul Alfille
On Sunday 31 July 2005 03:27 pm, Paul Alfille wrote: > No change was intended. Sounds like a new bug. > > Paul > > On Sunday 31 July 2005 06:35 am, Sven Geggus wrote: > > Christian Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You might need to bind owserver to listen on all addresses such as > > > >

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: current CVS version broken!

2005-07-31 Thread Paul Alfille
No change was intended. Sounds like a new bug. Paul On Sunday 31 July 2005 06:35 am, Sven Geggus wrote: > Christian Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You might need to bind owserver to listen on all addresses such as > > > >> owserver -u -p 0.0.0.0:5005 > >> owhttpd -p 8080 -s 5005 > > Hm,

[Owfs-developers] Re: current CVS version broken!

2005-07-31 Thread Sven Geggus
Christian Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it listens on 127.0.0.1:5005 as default if you only type > "-p 5005", that makes owserver unreachable for remote hosts. Then > you have to connect with "owhttpd -p 8080 -s 127.0.0.1:5005" OK, now a run into another Problem with owtcl: tcls

[Owfs-developers] Re: current CVS version broken!

2005-07-31 Thread Sven Geggus
Christian Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You might need to bind owserver to listen on all addresses such as >> owserver -u -p 0.0.0.0:5005 >> owhttpd -p 8080 -s 5005 Hm, I did not need to do this with the CVS Version from about one month ago. Anyway, if I use something like "-p 0.0.0.0:1