Hi Paul
Here is an example of owfs seg. faulting on my fc5. The setup is owserver
reading from the adaptor and a single DS18S20. After the second ll
/mnt/1-wire we have the problem again:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3th]$ ll /mnt/1-wire/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1 May 23 16:40 01.C0DE550A
drwxr-x
Jan, I'm having trouble duplicateing this on SuSE.
1. Do you know what version you are using?
2. Can you repeat without the thermocouple? (That's really the only
thing different).
Paul
On 5/18/06, Jan Bertelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And by the way: owhttpd is running without problems...
And by the way: owhttpd is running without problems...
Jan B.
On Thu, May 18, 2006 20:30, Jan Bertelsen wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Sure I will! With owfs from CVS today, owserver running in background and
> owfs running in gdb a TAB after the last ll...typeK
>
>
---
Hi Paul,
Sure I will! With owfs from CVS today, owserver running in background and
owfs running in gdb a TAB after the last ll...typeK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] owfs]$ ll /mnt/1-wire/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1 May 18 20:15 01.C0DE550A
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1 May 18 20:15 10.321DC6000800
drwx
I take that back. We weren't rechecking.
Can you run with --foreground --error_level=9 and see where it stops?
That will give some hints.
Paul
On 5/16/06, Paul Alfille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jan,
2.3p6 at least seems stable when not using owserver (see Christian's
note -- I'm working o
Hi Jan,
2.3p6 at least seems stable when not using owserver (see Christian's
note -- I'm working on it).
I do notice that we are (unnecessarily) rechecking the presence of a
device as it gets displayed for a directory listing. This could start
a new thread on the stack, and certainly is ineffici
Hi,
After some days with beautiful spring weather here in Denmark, I'm back at
the keyboard happy to find that owhttpd and owserver (owfs-2.3p5) is
running without any problem on my Fedora Core 5. Nice work!
owfs is still getting some seg faults but not all the time. When I read a
specific value
