Re: [Owlim-discussion] Poor performance for Sparql queries with property path optional elements

Thank you Ruslan, I will revert back to OWLIM 5.0 b5123 using Sesame 2.6.5 where all things seems fines (except the removeRepository, but I can live with it). I was just confused as I made tons of query testing to realise what are performance strong and weak queries and suddenly it had changed i

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Poor performance for Sparql queries with property path optional elements

Hi Marek, The new behaviour after we introduced the QueryJoinOptimizer is a feature we were looking for and it took much time to be implemented and stabilized in Sesame because in the beginning it was implemented like a different query model node (SPARQLIntersection), then this node disappear

Re: [Owlim-discussion] about AVL tree error

Hi Sinan, Which version of OWLIM is this? Our experience is that these kinds of errors result from repository corruption (due to a bug in OWLIM or some outage/interruption that left the repository in a bad state). Any further information in that line would be very helpful. Cheers, Ivan On Mon

Re: [Owlim-discussion] owlim 4.3 e 5.1 and lucene behaviour

Hi Nico, As of OWLIM 5.0, we upgraded our Lucene version to 3.5 (it used to be the quite dated 3.0). I can see the following note in the Lucene docs: "As of Lucene version 3.1, this class implements the Word Break rules from the Unicode Text Segmentation algorithm, as specified in Unicode Stand

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Poor performance for Sparql queries with property path optional elements

Hello Ruslan, Thanks for such an exhaustive answer! For now, we can just avoid using those optional property path elements in our Sparql queries and convert them to use unions instead - it seems to work properly for us and shouldn't be very time-consuming. This is still just a workaround thoug

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Putting statements into repository using Plug-in API

Hello, We just received the new Owlim version yesterday and we no longer experience this problem. Thanks for fixing this! -- Best regards, Krzysztof Sielski Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center W dniu 2012-06-19 09:41, Barry Bishop pisze: Hi Krzysztof, Just wanted to let you know tha

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Putting statements into repository using Plug-in API

Hi Krzysztof, Just wanted to let you know that issue was indeed fixed and is available in v5.1 Best, barry Barry Bishop OWLIM Product Manager Ontotext AD Tel: +43 650 2000 237 email: barry.bis...@ontotext.com skype: bazbishop www.ontotext.com On 29/05/12 10:19, Ivan Peikov wrote: Hi Krzysz

Re: [Owlim-discussion] owlim 4.3 e 5.1 and lucene behaviour

Hi Nico, I am not aware of any change in the tokenisation of literals during Lucene indexing, but I will discuss with the developers and get back to you. Best, barry Barry Bishop OWLIM Product Manager Ontotext AD Tel: +43 650 2000 237 email: barry.bis...@ontotext.com skype: bazbishop www.onto