Re: [Owlim-discussion] pending write reached

2012-11-21 Thread damyan
hi Nico, that means that at least 'PendigWritesLimit' updates are waiting to be processed due to some long running one still not finished ... or because of the said replication you are talking about. there is no way to flush/discard the pending updates. They will wait until processed or

Re: [Owlim-discussion] openrdf-sesame server starting issue

2012-11-21 Thread damyan
Hi Nazmul, the openrdf-sesame app will be initialized automatically when the workbench connects to it or you may access the main page at http://localhost:8081/openrdf-sesame/home/overview.view the workbench uses XLT's to create repositories. The war file distributed with Owlim SE has a SE

[Owlim-discussion] OWLIM 5.3 - SPARQL and math functions

2012-11-21 Thread Fabian Cretton
Hi, Is there anyway to use math functions (as square root) in SPARQL queries with OWLIM 5.3 ? If not, is it something planned or not to count on in a near future ? Thanks for the information Fabian ___ Owlim-discussion mailing list

Re: [Owlim-discussion] OWLIM 5.3 - SPARQL and math functions

2012-11-21 Thread Marek Šurek
Hi, there are two options, as long as I know. The first one is to try BIND((?a * ?a) AS ?aSquared) The second one could be to implement own Sesame SPARQL function(if you need complex math function as logarithms etc.). It is quite easy to implement and then insert into lib folder in server :

[Owlim-discussion] Rép. : Re: OWLIM 5.3 - SPARQL and math functions

2012-11-21 Thread Fabian Cretton
Thank you for the information, I guess I would need to write my custom implementation then for square root. But those mathematic function should be so widely used, it seems strange to me that no one has done that before. thanks Fabian Marek Šurekmarek_su...@yahoo.co.uk 21.11.2012 16:07 Hi,

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Rép. : Re: OWLIM 5.3 - SPARQL and math functions

2012-11-21 Thread Barry Norton
With apologies for slightly missing your point, with my previous answer, talking of standards (which SPIN isn't), note what RIF also omits: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/DTB#Numeric_Functions_and_Predicates Barry On 21/11/2012 16:52, Barry Norton wrote: No, the standard SPARQL 1.1