Re: [Owncloud] client 1.1.0 beta 3 remote change poll interval?

On 10.10.2012 22:48, Daniel Molkentin wrote: On 10.10.2012, at 21:36, Emre Erenoglu wrote: I'm testing the 1.1.0 Beta 3 client against 4.5.0 stable server. 1) I see that client polls the local disk every few seconds to detect changes. This is OK, but how would it behave for thousands of files

Re: [Owncloud] client 1.1.0 beta 3 remote change poll interval?

On 10.10.2012, at 21:36, Emre Erenoglu wrote: > > I'm testing the 1.1.0 Beta 3 client against 4.5.0 stable server. > > 1) I see that client polls the local disk every few seconds to detect > changes. This is OK, but how would it behave for thousands of files? > -->Would there be a roadmap w

[Owncloud] client 1.1.0 beta 3 remote change poll interval?

Hi, I'm testing the 1.1.0 Beta 3 client against 4.5.0 stable server. 1) I see that client polls the local disk every few seconds to detect changes. This is OK, but how would it behave for thousands of files? -->Would there be a roadmap where we could see some "file system monitoring" mechan

[Owncloud] Pull Request to fix Swift external files

Various bug fixes for swift external file support. - Space free reported as 0 so uploads were canceled - fopen would not create files, uploads failed - stat assumed path was an object, no way to stat directories for filecache scanner - unlink, called when deleting from web ui, assumed path was an

Re: [Owncloud] daily builds

Update. We now also have daily builds of the stable 45 branch. owncloud.org/releases/owncloud-daily-master.tar.bz2 owncloud.org/releases/owncloud-daily-stable45.tar.bz2 owncloud.org/releases/owncloud-daily-stable4.tar.bz2 The daily builds are meant for testing only. None of this are recommended

Re: [Owncloud] new web installer

On 10.10.2012, at 17:47, Achim Bohnet wrote: > On Monday 08 October 2012 23:57:33 Frank Karlitschek wrote: >> More good news everyone. >> >> I updated the new web based installer to download the latest ownCloud zip >> from our ssl server. This means that we are now protected against man in >> t

Re: [Owncloud] new web installer

On Monday 08 October 2012 23:57:33 Frank Karlitschek wrote: > More good news everyone. > > I updated the new web based installer to download the latest ownCloud zip > from our ssl server. This means that we are now protected against man in > the middle attacks. > https://github.com/owncloud/admini

Re: [Owncloud] ownCloud Client 1.1.0 beta3

Norman Rieß > So, noone else got this problem? [...] > > $ cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Debug" > > -DCSYNC_BINARY_DIR=../buildocsync/ ../mirall-- Could NOT find Csync > > (missing: CSYNC_INCLUDE_PATH) [...] Starter for ten: have you installed csync, along with the development files to ../buildocsyn

Re: [Owncloud] Review of pull request#26(improved persistent cookies) - second pair of eyes required

THX a lot - will read is soon! Am Mittwoch, dem 10.10.2012 um 12:40 schrieb Andre Gemuend: > Okay, I just submitted my comments. I hope I didn't do any mistakes. > This is my first Owncloud patch review. ;) > > Greetings > André > > On 10/10/2012 12:01 PM, Andre Gemuend wrote: > > Please don't

Re: [Owncloud] Review of pull request#26(improved persistent cookies) - second pair of eyes required

Okay, I just submitted my comments. I hope I didn't do any mistakes. This is my first Owncloud patch review. ;) Greetings André On 10/10/2012 12:01 PM, Andre Gemuend wrote: Please don't commit it. I'm preparing a review. Greetings Andre On 10/10/2012 11:10 AM, Thomas Müller wrote: Hi, can

Re: [Owncloud] Review of pull request#26(improved persistent cookies) - second pair of eyes required

Please don't commit it. I'm preparing a review. Greetings Andre On 10/10/2012 11:10 AM, Thomas Müller wrote: Hi, can someone please review this pull request: https://github.com/owncloud/core/pull/26 As it touches the very internal part of ownCloud I don't want to merge this without a second p

Re: [Owncloud] ownCloud Client 1.1.0 beta3

Hello, -DCSYNC_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/ocsync was indeed the answer. Thanks. Regards, Norman Am 09.10.2012 21:14, schrieb Klaas Freitag: > On 08.10.2012 14:35, Norman Rieß wrote: > > Sorry Norman, > > this oneeene slipped through... > >> Same error. >> >> $ cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Deb

Re: [Owncloud] Switching to PHPUnit

Am Mittwoch, dem 10.10.2012 um 11:23 schrieb Robin Appelman: > On Wednesday 03 October 2012 22:06:02 Robin Appelman wrote: > > Currently we use SimpleTest for out unit tests inside ownCloud, while this > > works fine for basic usage from the browser or the ci server, it lacks the > > tool support

Re: [Owncloud] Switching to PHPUnit

On Wednesday 03 October 2012 22:06:02 Robin Appelman wrote: > Currently we use SimpleTest for out unit tests inside ownCloud, while this > works fine for basic usage from the browser or the ci server, it lacks the > tool support that phpunit has. > > I've done most of the work of switching to phpu

[Owncloud] Review of pull request#26(improved persistent cookies) - second pair of eyes required

Hi, can someone please review this pull request: https://github.com/owncloud/core/pull/26 As it touches the very internal part of ownCloud I don't want to merge this without a second pair of eyes on it. THX a lot, Tom ___ Owncloud mailing list Ownclo

Re: [Owncloud] Branch Stable45 in master and apps

Hi, ci processes fpr 4.5 have been setup: http://ci.tmit.eu/view/ownCloud%204.5/ Take care, Tom Am Mittwoch, dem 10.10.2012 um 9:29 schrieb Frank Karlitschek: > Yes. > > But please don´t forget to give the stable branch some love too if you find > bugs :-) > > Frank > > > > On 09.10.2012

Re: [Owncloud] Branch Stable45 in master and apps

Yes. But please don´t forget to give the stable branch some love too if you find bugs :-) Frank On 09.10.2012, at 21:41, eMerzh wrote: > so it means that the master is open to new features? > > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Arthur Schiwon wrote: >> On Tuesday, October 09, 2012 06:04: