We have a lot of activity and good discussion. Thats good :-)
The real benchmark is of course how bugfree ownCloud 5 and 4.5.2 will be and
how happy our users are.
Please don´t forget to backport bugfixes to stable45 by the way. This is
important.
Thanks
Frank
On 06.11.2012, at 19:17, Jan-C
Just as an update after one week of working like that, I have to say
that so far it seems to work great! There’s always something you miss,
and through these reviews we’ll introduce less new issues in the code.
And good on everyone for fixing existing issues! Also see Frank’s
previous mail about t
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Sam Tuke wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 11:43 PM, Jan-Christoph Borchardt wrote:
>> TL;DR: Do not directly push to core master, and instead use pull
>> requests.
>
> How much of the procedure is enforced, and how much relies upon convention?
We are all smart people, so I
On 10/29/2012 11:43 PM, Jan-Christoph Borchardt wrote:
> TL;DR: Do not directly push to core master, and instead use pull
> requests.
How much of the procedure is enforced, and how much relies upon convention?
Who counts as a "reviewer" - should only certain people fulfil this role
(are there spec
TL;DR: Do not directly push to core master, and instead use pull
requests. Then other people can review it (@mention them), we identify
issues before they land in the code, and we’re all a bit happier.
But yeah, also read the complete thing at
http://owncloud.org/dev/code-reviews-on-github/
Than
Hi,
those of you being with us in Berlin last weekend already know about
all the discussions we had within the QA/Testing working group, the meeting
with all of you Sunday evening and in smaller groups of a few.
Thank you for your input and opinions!
As already announced by Frank on Sunday durin
