On Thursday, August 16, 2012 20:17:08 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Friday, August 03, 2012 19:21:08 Klaas Freitag wrote:
> > On 03.08.2012 19:18, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> > > In current client sync implementation, the user is either presented with
> > > a
> > > pre-defined sync location in the server
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Friday, August 03, 2012 19:21:08 Klaas Freitag wrote:
> > On 03.08.2012 19:18, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> > > In current client sync implementation, the user is either presented
> with a
> > > pre-defined sync location in the server, or t
On Friday, August 03, 2012 19:21:08 Klaas Freitag wrote:
> On 03.08.2012 19:18, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> > In current client sync implementation, the user is either presented with a
> > pre-defined sync location in the server, or the user needs to know the
> > location by typing it exactly. So for ex
On 03.08.2012 19:18, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
Hi,
In current client sync implementation, the user is either presented with a
pre-defined sync location in the server, or the user needs to know the
location by typing it exactly. So for example, if you want to sync some
files under the folder /myfiles/
Hi,
In current client sync implementation, the user is either presented with a
pre-defined sync location in the server, or the user needs to know the
location by typing it exactly. So for example, if you want to sync some
files under the folder /myfiles/work/project_a then you need to know this
an