Re: [OT] Patchd radiation reducer

2016-02-18 Thread Bec C
Where would I even look for the current scientific data? Cheers On Friday, 19 February 2016, Greg Keogh wrote: > Has any body any information about how well the Patchd radiation reducing >>> thing works? I can't seem to find much info besides the main site >>> patchd.com >>> >> > It's an old sc

Re: [OT] Patchd radiation reducer

2016-02-18 Thread Greg Keogh
> > Has any body any information about how well the Patchd radiation reducing >> thing works? I can't seem to find much info besides the main site >> patchd.com >> > It's an old scam that feeds off fear. *The Federal Government’s safety watchdog, the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Saf

Re: [OT] Patchd radiation reducer

2016-02-18 Thread David Connors
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 at 16:51 Bec C wrote: > Has any body any information about how well the Patchd radiation reducing > thing works? I can't seem to find much info besides the main site > patchd.com > It works on the principle of finding unsuspecting people who react strongly to cancer scares an

[OT] Patchd radiation reducer

2016-02-18 Thread Bec C
Hey all Has any body any information about how well the Patchd radiation reducing thing works? I can't seem to find much info besides the main site patchd.com Cheers

Re: [OT] - seeking junior dev

2016-02-18 Thread Wallace Turner
hi mate, thanks for email. would prefer someone onsite for the first couple of weeks as there will be lots of back and forth as the specs will change a bit initially. after that work from home is an option. Cheers Wal On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 2:40 PM, DotNet Dude wrote: > Yo Wal, you still looki