It would seem to be the case, CQRS and repository are not mutually exclusive
patterns, far from it actually. They are quite often used together. I would say
CQRS is far broader pattern than the repository which is simply to abstract
the data store mechanism whereas CQRS is a functionally more c
They probably just have an IQuery and an ICommand ;p
On Monday, 18 July 2016, Paul Glavich wrote:
> It would seem to be the case, CQRS and repository are not mutually
> exclusive patterns, far from it actually. They are quite often used
> together. I would say CQRS is far broader pattern than t
Yea, I was utilising CQRS as part of the asp.net boilerplate framework,
which is quite a sophisticated enterprise framework, for about 8 months. So
it completely threw me to suggest that you could somehow remove the need
for repository and replace it with CQRS. Both seemed to me to be part of
the p
