RE: [OT] RSS feed formatting

2013-07-16 Thread Ian Thomas
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Ian Thomas Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2013 10:21 AM To: 'ozDotNet' Subject: RE: [OT] RSS feed formatting Yes, that is the difference: originally, I saved the file-as-rendered (ie, what I saw in the IE10

RE: [OT] RSS feed formatting

2013-07-16 Thread Ian Thomas
Richards Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2013 9:39 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: [OT] RSS feed formatting Wow, that sucks. Surely its not the responsibility of the browser to modify the source. It's not really saving the source then, its more like "exporting" the content. Actually, now

Re: [OT] RSS feed formatting

2013-07-16 Thread David Richards
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] > On Behalf Of Mark Hurd > Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2013 11:01 PM > To: ozDotNet > Subject: Re: [OT] RSS feed formatting > > That seems to be an artifact of IE's processing of RSS. The URL of the > subscribed page (as seen in the Prop

RE: [OT] RSS feed formatting

2013-07-16 Thread Ian Thomas
o:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Mark Hurd Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2013 11:01 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: [OT] RSS feed formatting That seems to be an artifact of IE's processing of RSS. The URL of the subscribed page (as seen in the Properties of the page) is: http://www.micro

Re: [OT] RSS feed formatting

2013-07-16 Thread Mark Hurd
s >>> >>> Victoria Park, Western Australia >>> >>> >>> >>> From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] >>> On Behalf Of David Richards >>> Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2013 10:49 AM >>> >>&g

Re: [OT] RSS feed formatting

2013-07-16 Thread Mark Hurd
;> From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] >> On Behalf Of David Richards >> Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2013 10:49 AM >> >> >> To: ozDotNet >> Subject: Re: [OT] RSS feed formatting >> >> >> >> Its re

Re: [OT] RSS feed formatting

2013-07-16 Thread Mark Hurd
ll in ignorance. > > > > Ian Thomas > > Victoria Park, Western Australia > > > > From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] > On Behalf Of David Richards > Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2013 10:49 AM > > > To: ozDotNet > Subject: Re: [O

RE: [OT] RSS feed formatting

2013-07-16 Thread Ian Thomas
David Richards Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2013 10:49 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: [OT] RSS feed formatting Its referenced in the file. Just look at the source, you'll see it at the top of the file. If it's not specified or if the file is missing, IE will just use a default one which is the X

Re: [OT] RSS feed formatting

2013-07-15 Thread David Richards
e for the transformation file? > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Ian Thomas > > Victoria Park, Western Australia > > ** ** > > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto: > ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *David Richards > *Sent:* Tuesday, 16 July

RE: [OT] RSS feed formatting

2013-07-15 Thread Ian Thomas
...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of David Richards Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2013 9:03 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: [OT] RSS feed formatting You're not saving the CSS. In the example you gave, try grabbing the CSS file as well: http://www.microsoft.com/atwork/community/RssPretty.xslt David

Re: [OT] RSS feed formatting

2013-07-15 Thread David Richards
You're not saving the CSS. In the example you gave, try grabbing the CSS file as well: http://www.microsoft.com/atwork/community/RssPretty.xslthttp://www.microsoft.com/atwork/community/RssPretty.xslt> David "If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards

[OT] RSS feed formatting

2013-07-15 Thread Ian Thomas
This is a naïve question, maybe someone can explain. If I browse to an RSS feed (eg, Microsoft at Work ) the browser formats it consistently. Yet, saving the XML file itself and then later opening the saved-to-disk file in the same browser (eg, I