Microsoft Reference Source

2014-05-08 Thread Greg Keogh
I just stumbled across this: http://referencesource.microsoft.com/ with all the .NET Framework 4.5.1 source code. I get the impression it's been there since late Feb 2014. There's some fascinating and bewildering stuff in there. Some classes you think might be quite simple are frighteningly complex

Re: Microsoft Reference Source

2014-05-08 Thread Jano Petras
Yeah, I've been looking through that few times. Last time had to provide an answer as to which randomisation method (out of standardised ones ANSI/IEEE etc) we use - and because we use Random class from the framework I went to check on it - and found a comment in there that says //This algorithm c

Re: Microsoft Reference Source

2014-05-08 Thread Greg Keogh
> > Yeah, I've been looking through that few times. Last time had to provide > an answer as to which randomisation method (out of standardised ones > ANSI/IEEE etc) we use - and because we use Random class from the framework > I went to check on it - and found a comment in there that says > > //Thi

Re: Microsoft Reference Source

2014-05-08 Thread Geoffrey Huntley
Don't look at this unless you never want to do open source contributions to Mono. Looking/studying MSREF still excludes you from being a able to contribute - indefinitely. Regards, Geoff On 9 May 2014 09:09, "Greg Keogh" wrote: > I just stumbled across this: http://referencesource.microsoft.com/

RE: Microsoft Reference Source

2014-05-09 Thread David Kean
Glad you like it! Feel free to pass any feedback on to me, my team owns it. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Jano Petras Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 4:14 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Microsoft Reference Source Yeah, I've been lo

RE: Microsoft Reference Source

2014-05-09 Thread David Kean
: Microsoft Reference Source Don't look at this unless you never want to do open source contributions to Mono. Looking/studying MSREF still excludes you from being a able to contribute - indefinitely. Regards, Geoff On 9 May 2014 09:09, "Greg Keogh" mailto:g...@mira.net>> wrote: I