Hi all,
thanks for the suggestions I've begun to implement most of them and have a
timeline to evaluate and bring in the rest.
I was wondering if I could lean on you guys again and get any video
suggestions that have really stood out particularly in the web
development/.net space. We've got a
.
- Glav
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Andrew Coates (DX AUSTRALIA)
Sent: Tuesday, 9 February 2016 4:21 PM
To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Subject: SPAM-LOW: RE: [OT] Internal Developer Training
7’s probably at the bott
I highly recommend doing code reviews. Not only does it improve the quality of
your code base, but its a two way learning avenue. The person reviewing the
author’s code gets to understand what the code is doing. The Author thinks
through their own reasoning while trying to accurately explain
+1 for code reviews. Plus technical brown bag sessions once a week or
fortnight
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Stephen Price
wrote:
> I highly recommend doing code reviews. Not only does it improve the
> quality of your code base, but its a two way learning avenue.
Hello
" I've found that especially their C# skillsets are limited " , What would
facilitate that finding? I have been wondering what makes one bad
at language and still get to be a programmer?
for example what is point of quiz code like this :
try
divide by 0
catch
return 1
finally
return
Hi Dave,
How big is your team?
One of the things we’ve seen work well is to have a regular “internal user
group” every fortnight, put 2 hours aside over lunch or towards the end of the
day, bring in pizza, and have someone from your team do a general technical
presentation (45-60 min). Then
Cheers this looks awesome! Team is 7 people so not small.
On 9 Feb 2016 17:22, "Andrew Coates (DX AUSTRALIA)" <
andrew.coa...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>
>
> How big is your team?
>
>
>
> One of the things we’ve seen work well is to have a regular “internal user
> group” every fortnight,
uot;ozDotNet" <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Subject: Re: [OT] Internal Developer Training
Hello
" I've found that especially their C# skillsets are limited " , What would
facilitate that finding? I have been wondering what makes one bad at language
and still get to be a programmer?
-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Andrew Coates (DX AUSTRALIA)
Sent: Tuesday, 9 February 2016 4:21 PM
To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Subject: RE: [OT] Internal Developer Training
7’s probably at the bottom end of enough for critical mass. You don’t need many
people to be on leave
alf Of *Dave Walker
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 9 February 2016 4:16 PM
> *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
> *Subject:* RE: [OT] Internal Developer Training
>
>
>
> Cheers this looks awesome! Team is 7 people so not small.
>
> On 9 Feb 2016 17:22, "Andrew Coates (DX AUS
: Mark Hurd<mailto:markeh...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 9 February 2016 4:37 PM
To: ozDotNet<mailto:ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Subject: Re: Interview question pseudocode (was RE: [OT] Internal Developer
Training)
If the question was *What happens here?" or "Analyse this code (in va
Hi sure thing. So team is made up of Web devs (html, CSS, and some js),
automated testers etc who it was not a priority in company for them to have
good coding standards. I disagree on this front and so want to improve
their skillsets to be able to accomplish a wider variety of tasks. They are
on
-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Walker
Sent: Tuesday, 9 February 2016 4:16 PM
To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
Subject: RE: [OT] Internal Developer Training
Cheers this looks awesome! Team is 7 people so not small.
On 9 Feb 2016 17:22, "Andrew Coates (DX AUSTRALIA)&qu
13 matches
Mail list logo