Re: Assembly binding woes

2011-09-20 Thread Matt Siebert
Just getting back to this now... Both assemblies are referencing the .NET 3.5 version of Autofac and the 4.0 version is out because these assemblies are being loaded into a .NET 3.5 process (3rd party native app that hosts .NET 3.5 for plugins). To add a probing path it would need to go in the

Re: Assembly binding woes

2011-09-19 Thread Mark Hurd
Can't help, but that sounds like a well enough explained problem for stackoverflow.com. -- Regards, Mark Hurd, B.Sc.(Ma.)(Hons.) On 19 September 2011 15:57, Matt Siebert mlsieb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I have some assembly binding weirdness happening that I don't fully understand.  I have

Re: Assembly binding woes

2011-09-19 Thread Preet Sangha
Matt, can you try and use a probe path using a symbolic linked subdirectory to the real directory? On 19 September 2011 18:27, Matt Siebert mlsieb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I have some assembly binding weirdness happening that I don't fully understand. I have some theories but I'd like to

RE: Assembly binding woes

2011-09-19 Thread David Kean
If overrides are not getting called, then is a sign that the runtime seeing that that the virtual method takes a different ContainerBuilder type (ie 3.5) to the override (4.0 or vice versa) and hence are not seen as compatible. I just ran this by Nick (who owns Autofac and is down the hall from