RE: Target x86/x64

2016-11-29 Thread David Kean
Yes that’s correct. We don’t do anything different when you compile for AnyCPU vs x64 in C# or VB. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Greg Keogh Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 11:13 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Target x86/x64 Old thread

Re: Target x86/x64

2016-11-24 Thread Greg Keogh
> > Old thread, but catching up with old posts, and no replies here. > > No, it won't. All it does is control a flag that goes into the exe header > so the OS knows what size process to run it in. > >> Now that almost all desktop and server machines are running 64-bit >> Windows, I want to know if

Re: Target x86/x64

2016-11-24 Thread Piers Williams
Old thread, but catching up with old posts, and no replies here. No, it won't. All it does is control a flag that goes into the exe header so the OS knows what size process to run it in. You can even change this post-build if you want (corflags.exe). Adding a native compilation step is another ma

RE: Target x86/x64

2016-07-02 Thread Nick Randolph
Greg Your thinking is somewhat echoed by Microsoft with their move to .NET Core (https://www.microsoft.com/net/core#windows) and .NET Native (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn600165(v=vs.110).aspx). Essentially there is a broader recognition that JIT’d apps are slow and that in order