Cross posting this, I'm on too many lists. Hope that doesn't offend...
I've got a unit test that is throwing an exception. (Finally got it hitting
my catch block) Its a smoke test so has a loop in it for every view. I want
it to NOT fail the test if an exception is hit. I want it to output to
debu
[TestMethod]
[ExpectedException(typeof(InvalidOperationException))]
public void Foor()
{
On 22/03/2012 10:35 AM, Stephen Price wrote:
Cross posting this, I'm on too many lists. Hope that doesn't offend...
I've got a unit test that is throwing an exception. (Finally got i
Tried that. It then passes the test as soon as the exception is hit. not
what I want, I just want it to handle the exception.
Interestingly, its saying theres a null exception unhandled despite me
having a catch. How do you handle nested exceptions? Nested try catch's?
I'm grasping at straws here.
what unit test runner are you using ?
On 22/03/2012 10:59 AM, Stephen Price wrote:
Tried that. It then passes the test as soon as the exception is hit.
not what I want, I just want it to handle the exception.
Interestingly, its saying theres a null exception unhandled despite me
having a catc
this passes for me.
[TestMethod]
public void Test1()
{
try
{
throw new Exception("foo");
}
catch (Exception e)
{
}
}
On 22/03/2012 10:59 AM, Stephen Price wrote:
Tried that. It the
Ok, I must have an unhandled exception getting through still. What happens
if more than one exception is thrown? Maybe its related to the unit test
running asyncronously?
I'm thinking its going to be more work but might be better to have a single
unit test per view.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:07
bject: Re: unit tests and exception
Ok, I must have an unhandled exception getting through still. What happens if
more than one exception is thrown? Maybe its related to the unit test running
asyncronously?
I'm thinking its going to be more work but might be better to have a single
unit tes
Run the unit test debugging and ensure you have break on exceptions
ticked:
On 22/03/2012 11:10 AM, Stephen Price wrote:
Ok, I must have an unhandled exception getting through
still. What happens if more than one exception is thrown? Maybe
its related to
If you have Just My Code turned on, then you shouldn't need to do this. It will
break earlier.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Wallace Turner
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 8:13 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: unit tests and exception
I mean, it will/it should break in the last user code.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of David Kean
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 8:23 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: unit tests and exception
If you have Just My Code turned on, then you
et.com] *On Behalf Of *David Kean
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 21, 2012 8:23 PM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* RE: unit tests and exception
>
> ** **
>
> If you have Just My Code turned on, then you shouldn’t need to do this. It
> will break earlier.
>
> ** **
>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Stephen Price
wrote:
> Cross posting this, I'm on too many lists. Hope that doesn't offend...
>
> I've got a unit test that is throwing an exception. (Finally got it hitting
> my catch block) Its a smoke test so has a loop in it for every view. I want
> it to NOT f
Debug.WriteLine("Error {0} while loading {1}", e.Message, uri);
uri being the string uri of the view in question...
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:24 PM, DotNet Dude wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Stephen Price
> wrote:
> > Cross posting this, I'm on too many lists. Hope that doesn't o
13 matches
Mail list logo
