Re: VBAC Article

2002-05-28 Thread Carol Thorogood
Hi all (Jackie M I am in SA in case you wondered where I'd got to). It's a pity that the authors of the NY Times didn't read the full article! I haven't read all of it. It's a retrospective study so that reduces its usefulness. Secondly it's one thing to plan a properly managed VBAC and quit

Re: VBAC Article

2002-05-28 Thread Alphia Garrety
This was in the New York Times- May 22nd, 2002 Study Finds Birth Risk After Delivery by Caesarean By REUTERS CHICAGO, May 21 — Giving birth naturally after delivering a previous child by Caesarean carries a higher, albeit small, risk to the newborn, British researchers said today. A study of fiv

Re: VBAC Article

2002-05-28 Thread jireland
Oh no is this going to do for VBACS WHAT THE BL BREECH TRIAL DID FOR BREECH BIRTHS. I have just supported 2 women at homebirths both were Vbacs and both had according to obstetricans CPD [based on last birth and post partum pelvimetry]BOTH DELIVERED WELL Both their babies were bigger than pr

Re: Homebirth and DOCS

2002-05-28 Thread Leigh Evans
Hi Sue, I just screamed because I can't swear! Hope the parents found out who informed DOCS and gave her a ear full. Hope you are well. Leigh - Original Message - From: "Sue Cookson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 3:10 AM Subject: Homebirth and D