d manipulation will alter that, so tell it like it is &
name it appropriately.
BM
- Original Message -
From: "Gloria Lemay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery-led units - warning, a bit of a rav
8:15 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery-led units - warning, a bit of a rave!
I tend to agree with Jenny, Community led birth centre would address the
potential for alienating other family members, particularly fathers who
at times need just as much support and understanding as the mothers, th
nothing wrong with midwives leading the way.
> Many women wish to
> have the guidance and leadership of a midwife and
> that's what they'll get in
> those units. I like to have things named
> accurately instead of all the
> mumbo-jumbo positive thinking nauseating thi
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wump fish
Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2005 10:01 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery-led units - warning, a bit of a rave!
I think the 'baby friendly initiative' doesn't
o-jumbo positive thinking nauseating things that people think up in
order to smear peanut butter over bad behaviour. Gloria in Canada
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery-led units - warnin
I tend to agree with Jenny, Community led birth centre would address the
potential for alienating other family members, particularly fathers who
at times need just as much support and understanding as the mothers, the
other point I like is that it literally throws it back onto the
community to take
hilst I had a nap.
If we are going to be truely 'baby friendly' we need to move birth back into
the family environment.
Rachel
From: JoFromOz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwif
n with infant attention.
Must be a happy medium !
BM
- Original Message -
From: "Kate &/or Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery-led units - warning, a bit of a rave!
- >>how
idwifery staff on tap.
Just my thoughts...
Tania
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of brendamanning
Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2005 4:23 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery-led units - warning, a bit of a rave!
Behalf Of Jennifairy
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005
5:25 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery-led
units - warning, a bit of a rave!
ok, bear with me while I think out loud
in your general direction
well we have the 'baby friendly
hospital initi
.
Tania
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of brendamanning
Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2005 4:23 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery-led units - warning, a bit of a rave!
Kate,
Must admit I also promot
It's not just all about breast-feeding though is it ?
BM
- Original Message -
From: "Emily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery-led units - warning, a bit of a rave!
wow
does she not know of c
p;/or Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Midwifery-led units - warning, a bit of a rave!
- >>how about the 'woman friendly birth centre'?
There's a lot of different definitions of that one. Just had
wow
does she not know of colostrum?
or the link b/w early feeds and breastfeeding success
?
or think women may miss their bub?
how strange.
--- Kate &/or Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - >>how about the 'woman friendly birth centre'?
>
> There's a lot of different definitions of that
- >>how about the 'woman friendly birth centre'?
There's a lot of different definitions of that one. Just had a placement
with a m/w who promoted woman-friendly over baby-friendly. Her idea of w-f
was to have longer hospital stays, baby in nursery, bottlefed until woman's
milk comes in. Sh
ok, bear with me while I think out loud in your general
direction
well we have the 'baby friendly hospital initiative', so how
about the 'woman friendly birth centre'? I mean, better
still, 'the community' (representatives of) should really be
heavily involved in this kind of primary care heal
16 matches
Mail list logo