Re: Melbourne's Child article

2002-06-04 Thread Vernon at Stringybark
ystem regards Barb. > From: "Vicki Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: Women of Spirit > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 11:53:57 -0700 > To: "'ozmidwifery'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Melb

RE: Melbourne's Child article

2002-06-03 Thread Sally Williams
YAAAY! Vicki. Love Sally _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe or unsubscribe.

RE: Melbourne's Child article

2002-06-03 Thread Macha McDonald
Im not sure who the MCH nurse was, but she operates in the Berrigan area (actually rural NSW - my mistake) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jo Zoch Sent: Monday, 3 June 2002 10:46 AM To: ozmidwifery Subject: Re: Melbourne's Child ar

RE: Melbourne's Child article

2002-06-02 Thread Vicki Chan
Oh, she told us just to forget all that white man shit and get on and do what we please...we've been fine ever since' Vicki -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Macha McDonald Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 6:28 AM To: ozmidwifery Subject:

Re: Melbourne's Child article

2002-06-02 Thread Jo Zoch
Given this, women DO decide to formula feed based on the length of time a baby might sleep between feeds :( Jo - Original Message - From: "Macha McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ozmidwifery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 11:27 PM Subject: RE:

RE: Melbourne's Child article

2002-06-02 Thread louise johnson
k the > whole situation is worse than we think, and I am > surprised that anyone is > breastfeeding at all, considering the current > climatein my humble > opinion!!! > Regards, Macha. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On &g

RE: Melbourne's Child article

2002-06-02 Thread Macha McDonald
PM To: ozmidwifery Subject: RE: Melbourne's Child article Dear Liz While I agree wholeheartedly with most of the discussion on this, and I have seen the article in question, I feel I need to make a comment about your statement : < The 'baby friendly initiative' I believe, was a

RE: Melbourne's Child article

2002-06-02 Thread Johnston
Dear Liz While I agree wholeheartedly with most of the discussion on this, and I have seen the article in question, I feel I need to make a comment about your statement : < The 'baby friendly initiative' I believe, was aimed at developing countries whose children were dying of diarrhoeal diseas