Re: [ozmidwifery] First to second twin birth interval

2005-06-01 Thread Lindsay & Yvette
Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 192: 1420-2 The length of time between the birth of the first and second twin has no significant effect on the immediate neonatal outcome of the younger twin, according to the results of a new study. -- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit <

[ozmidwifery] First to second twin birth interval

2005-06-01 Thread Judy Chapman
of the first and second twin has no significant effect on the immediate neonatal outcome of the younger twin, according to the results of a new study. Specialists in maternal-fetal medicine at the Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital in Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA, reviewed the hospital’s medical records

Re: second twin

2001-08-17 Thread Robin Moon
ange of options on board as we continue to discuss this. Thank you. Robin. - Original Message - From: "David Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ozmid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 9:56 AM Subject: second twin > Jan and Robin > I

RE: second twin

2001-08-17 Thread David Simon
s/common/guide/pdfs/cs1Twins91.pdf David -Original Message- From: Toni Cannard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 18 August 2001 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: second twin Dear David, Can you please explain further your statement that the Guid

Re: second twin

2001-08-17 Thread Toni Cannard
Dear David, Can you please explain further your statement that the Guide to Effective Care statement and other research you stated below are not relevant to this argument? Kind regards, Toni >From: "David Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "ozmid" <[EMAI

second twin

2001-08-17 Thread David Simon
Jan and Robin I don't think you should trivialise the concerns of the registrar in regard to the second twin, but equally, a discussion should be able to take place without personal attack. Neither the Effective Care statement on elective caesar vs vaginal birth for twins, nor the various st