The search pages have some specific requirements for content place holders that
the default.master doesn’t have. What you are doing is perfectly fine, but it
does mean you have to put in more work when creating a search site (which is
fine if you only ever going to have one).
From: ozmoss-boun.
That’s pretty much what I do as well.
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Paul Noone
Sent: Tuesday, 10 February 2015 11:09 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: Different masterpages in site collection
Yes, I noticed. Which is why I always apply my own master. I
Yes, I noticed. Which is why I always apply my own master. I thought maybe
there was a reason they used the minimal master but I’ve yet to find one. ☺
In fact the whole Search Center sucks. I usually create my own and then apply
my search layout pages which include refiner web parts and whatever
The enterprise search site template relies on a minimal master page that is
separate from the default.master or whatever master page you select (which is
why you don’t get navigation in the search sites by default – which sucks).
Maybe you never noticed?
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:
Why do you need a separate master for Search pages? Is there something I’m
missing?
I’ve always managed to get away with an application and system masterpage and
perform the rest of the work in layouts.
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Ishai Sagi
Hi ishai
Is 2013 and hymn security option is configured for YouTube.
Strange thing is publishing html field added via content type does not save
the link, oh shows in preview.
If I add list column of multiple lines with rich text option than it does
save the video.
Cheers
Ajay
On Monday, Februar
