On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Andreas Mock andreas.m...@web.de wrote:
Hi all,
after a long period I started to check out the current state of
clustering with linux.
As it seems that the SuSE guys go to the direction of pacemaker/openais
I want to give that a try.
a) Is this the right
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:32 PM, hj lee kerd...@gmail.com wrote:
I rebooted the system a few days ago. If it happens again, will post it. But
can you guess any how cib query returns multiple entries?
Not based on the information so far. Sorry.
___
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:01:30PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
..
acls
role id=admin
write id=admin-write-0 tag=configuration/
write id=admin-write-1 tag=status/
/role
role id=operator
write id=operator-write-0 tag=nodes/
write
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
Gesendet: 12.01.10 09:19:59
An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker/OpenAIS Software for openSuSE 11.2
a) Is this the right mailing list or can I ask pacemaker/openais questions
yes
Am Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 12:24:56 schrieb Andreas Mock:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
Gesendet: 12.01.10 09:19:59
An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker/OpenAIS Software for openSuSE 11.2
a) Is this the
Hi Dejan,
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:01:30PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
..
acls
role id=admin
write id=admin-write-0 tag=configuration/
write id=admin-write-1 tag=status/
/role
role id=operator
write
Unless there are violent objections, I plan to officially stop supporting 0.6
at the end of February.
Since I've not seeing any bugs reported for some time, it seems that anyone
still using 0.6 is happy with it for their workload.
Also, 1.0 has been out for over a year now and contains
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff
mi...@multinet.de wrote:
You could try:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/ha-clustering/openSUSE_11.2/
I dont see pacemaker in there, so not sure that helps much.
___
Pacemaker
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
Gesendet: 12.01.10 13:32:00
An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker/OpenAIS Software for openSuSE 11.2
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff
mi...@multinet.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 14:48:12 schrieb Emmanuel Lesouef:
Hi,
We use a rather old (in fact, very old) combination :
heartbeat 2.99 + openhpi 2.12
What do you suggest in order to upgrade to the latest version of
pacemaker ?
Thanks.
http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Upgrade
--
Dr.
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:00:56PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
Hi Dejan,
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:01:30PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
..
acls
role id=admin
write id=admin-write-0 tag=configuration/
write id=admin-write-1
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Florian Haas florian.h...@linbit.comwrote:
On 2010-01-09 10:00, cheibi welid wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently testing a HA cluster with DRBD (Pacemaker, Heartbeat,
DRBD) and i need OCF scripts for cups and courier-imap. I want to know
if those scripts
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:37 PM, hj lee kerd...@gmail.com wrote:
It happened again, I attched cib files and log messages of both nodes. The
problem happened last night, but cib file was captured this morning. As you
can see below log expert, the attrd receives 2 entries for cib_query,
d) If I would try to compile from source as described at
http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Install#First_Steps
one step is to get openais. Why are all the relevant
prebuild library packages called corosync?
I don't understand the distinction between openais and corosync
read this link:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:15 PM, hj lee kerd...@gmail.com wrote:
2010-01-12 00:19:47.879800 copper1-cib: [4764]: debug: cib_process_xpath:
Processing cib_query op for //cib/status//node_sta...@id='
copper1.dr.peach.com']//nvpa...@name='master-vmrd-res:0']
These parameters are from the totem protocol implemented by the openais. The
token is the timeout to determine the token loss. The join is the timeout to
send the join message during the gather state. The consensus is the consensus
timeout during the gather state. And the max_message is a flow
Hi all
I'm attempting to build a 2-way cluster, SLES-11-based with an
openais/pacemaker stack. I've got the nodes and a resource (a drbd volume)
happening. What I'm not sure about is the active CRM DC election process.
I configured a null stonith resource for each node.
I have stonith-enabled
Separate to my earlier post re CRM DC election in a 2-way cluster, I'm chasing
up the (separate) issue of making the cluster a CROSS-SITE one.
As stated in yay other thread, I'm running a 2-way quorum-agnostic cluster on a
SLES11, openais, pacemaker, drbd (... clvm, ocfs2, ctdb, nfs, etc) on HP
18 matches
Mail list logo
