Re: [Pacemaker] fedora 10 package update from yum

Hi E-Blokos, E-Blokos escribió: On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:22 PM, E-Blokos wrote: On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:08 AM, E-Blokos wrote: Hi, I tried to update the latest pacemaker version for fedora 10 From? but failed : Transaction Check Error: file /etc/ha.d/shellfuncs conflicts between

Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave Confusion

Thanks for the tip, I think I'm closer... I set a preference and then tried to start the LDAP service, and the crm monitor shows testvm3 (my preferred master) trying to start LDAP as a master repeatedly but failing. It does this like 2 times per second. I think I'm very, very close to nailin

Re: [Pacemaker] No more resource monitoring operations after running crm status, pacemaker 1.0.7

Wow! That was fast! :) I've tried the latest cluster-glue revision and resource monitoring is working fine now. Kind regards Johan Eriksson On Tuesday 02 February 2010 18:17:18 Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:12:41PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sa

Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave Confusion

The script should set a preference for being promoted using crm_master. Have a look at LinBit's drbd script for a good example. Thanks for the tip, I think I'm closer... I set a preference and then tried to start the LDAP service, and the crm monitor shows testvm3 (my preferred master) trying

Re: [Pacemaker] No more resource monitoring operations after running crm status, pacemaker 1.0.7

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:12:41PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 04:10:22PM +0100, Johan Eriksson wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I've tested Pacemaker 1.0.7 with heartbeat 3.0.2 on a two-node cluster > > running > > Gentoo. Whenever I run "crm status", monitoring of

Re: [Pacemaker] fedora 10 package update from yum

- Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekhof" To: Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 4:51 AM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] fedora 10 package update from yum On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:22 PM, E-Blokos wrote: - Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekhof" To: Cc: Sent: Sunday,

Re: [Pacemaker] No more resource monitoring operations after running crm status, pacemaker 1.0.7

Hi, On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 04:10:22PM +0100, Johan Eriksson wrote: > Hi. > > I've tested Pacemaker 1.0.7 with heartbeat 3.0.2 on a two-node cluster > running > Gentoo. Whenever I run "crm status", monitoring of resources are cancelled > during the next monitoring cycle on the node where I iss

Re: [Pacemaker] Fwd: [Cluster-devel] Organizing Bug Squash Partyfor Cluster 3.x, GFS2 and more

Koch, Sebastian wrote: > Hi, > > i am kind of new in the whole cluster stuff but i would like to > participateand contribute. But the main questions in which country ;-) I'd guess in #linux-cluster country, no? :) ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@

Re: [Pacemaker] Fwd: [Cluster-devel] Organizing Bug Squash Partyfor Cluster 3.x, GFS2 and more

Hi, i am kind of new in the whole cluster stuff but i would like to participateand contribute. But the main questions in which country ;-) Best Regards, Sebastian Koch   NETZWERK GmbH Fon:  +49.711.220 5498 81 Mobil: +49.160.907 908 30 Fa

Re: [Pacemaker] Fwd: [Cluster-devel] Organizing Bug Squash Party for Cluster 3.x, GFS2 and more

Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2010 11:54:09 schrieb Andrew Beekhof: > Anyone interested in taking part? > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Fabio M. Di Nitto > Date: Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM > Subject: [Cluster-devel] Organizing Bug Squash Party for Cluster 3.x, > GFS2 and more > T

Re: [Pacemaker] nodes in different network

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Herbert Monteiro wrote: > Hi Andrew, > >> But how far apart are the severs and what is the connection between them >> like? > > Geographically the server are in diffrent states, but in the same > domain (one with IP 200.237193.x and other with 200.133.192..x). I

[Pacemaker] Fwd: [Cluster-devel] Organizing Bug Squash Party for Cluster 3.x, GFS2 and more

Anyone interested in taking part? -- Forwarded message -- From: Fabio M. Di Nitto Date: Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM Subject: [Cluster-devel] Organizing Bug Squash Party for Cluster 3.x, GFS2 and more To: linux clustering , cluster-devel Hi everybody, this is the first time t

Re: [Pacemaker] fedora 10 package update from yum

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:22 PM, E-Blokos wrote: > > - Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekhof" > To: > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 2:58 PM > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] fedora 10 package update from yum > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:08 AM, E-Blokos wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I tr

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource cannot run anywhere

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Erich Weiler wrote: > So, I have 3 Floating IP addresses, between 3 nodes, with each IP address > having a preference for each node.  But the third one, ClusterIP3, is not > running and the "crm_verify -VL" command says that ClusterIP3 cannot run > anywhere.  But, I

Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave Confusion

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Erich Weiler wrote: > How does one promote a slave to master automatically? The script should set a preference for being promoted using crm_master. Have a look at LinBit's drbd script for a good example. ___ Pacemaker ma

Re: [Pacemaker] crm_attribte failed with Multiple attributes match

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:50 AM, hj lee wrote: > Sorry, my typo. I meant openais-0.80.5 in > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/ha-clustering/CentOS_5/i386/ > I had so many problems with this openais-0.80.5. After upgrading > corosync-1.1.2, most issues are gone. FYI, http://www.clu