Re: [Pacemaker] Frustrating fun with Pacemaker / CentOS / Apache

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Paul Graydon wrote: > On 2/16/2010 1:04 PM, Angie T. Muhammad wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Paul Graydon wrote: > >> On 2/16/2010 10:48 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> The first error doesn't concern me particularly, it's a known Apache bug >

Re: [Pacemaker] Frustrating fun with Pacemaker / CentOS / Apache

On 2/16/2010 1:04 PM, Angie T. Muhammad wrote: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Paul Graydon > wrote: On 2/16/2010 10:48 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: The first error doesn't concern me particularly, it's a known Apache bug relating to the proxy module

Re: [Pacemaker] Frustrating fun with Pacemaker / CentOS / Apache

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Paul Graydon wrote: > On 2/16/2010 10:48 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > The first error doesn't concern me particularly, it's a known Apache bug > > relating to the proxy module that doesn't actually break anything. It's the > binding errors that are bothering m

Re: [Pacemaker] Frustrating fun with Pacemaker / CentOS / Apache

On 2/16/2010 10:48 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: The first error doesn't concern me particularly, it's a known Apache bug relating to the proxy module that doesn't actually break anything. It's the binding errors that are bothering me and presumably what is stopping pacemaker from starting the serv

Re: [Pacemaker] Questions about 2-node cluster with mysql, apache, tomcat and shared partition

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Glauber Cabral wrote: > Hi people. > I've been reading about cluster for some time and trying to configure > a 2-node cluster with shared storage. > I've already used the IRC channel, but these questions were to big to > ask there and I though the list should be a

Re: [Pacemaker] Frustrating fun with Pacemaker / CentOS / Apache

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Paul Graydon wrote: > I've been hitting my head against the same brick wall all day today and its > really beginning to get frustrating. > > Overview:   two test servers straight forward CentOS-5.4 servers running > Apache, and pacemaker on top of OpenAIS.  I've us

Re: [Pacemaker] drbd doesn't work on simple 2-node cluster.

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Kees wrote: > Hello Alexandr, > > I came from a 3-node cluster, so i had  symmetric-cluster="false" > configured. > But things did not work and I went back to a 2-node situation just to check > if that was still working. My 2-node setup was working but with >  symm

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker-mgmt RPM for centos?

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:22 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > I am setting up a pacemaker (1.0.7) cluster (corosync) with centos-5.4 - I > used the repo: http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm/epel-5/i386/. However I > can't find the rpms for the Python GUI. Its on my todo list :-) > Is there a rpm build for e

Re: [Pacemaker] How to really disable stonith?

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Alexandr Krylovskiy wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:50:45 +0300 > Alexandr Krylovskiy wrote: > >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:00:55 +0100 >> Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Alexandr Krylovskiy >> > wrote: >> > >  I have two-nodes clust

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH cts] add a wrapper function for "Pat:They_Stopped"

Applied! http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/devel/rev/5e20c1b2585f Btw. if you do hg export, you'll also get credit for the patch in the history :) On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 00:06 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:5

Re: [Pacemaker] on fail standby with migration-threshold

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:41 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to have this configuration on my 2 nodes test cluster : > * After two failures on a resource, standby the node and move the resource > away. In fact this : > > primitive APACHE ocf:me:apache \ >        params url="http://localhost

Re: [Pacemaker] cib and attrd processes segfault

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Alessandro Federico wrote: > Hi all, > we have just installed the latest versions of pacemaker/corosync software: > cluster-glue-1.0.3-1.el5.x86_64 > cluster-glue-libs-1.0.3-1.el5.x86_64 > corosync-1.2.0-1.el5.x86_64 > corosynclib-1.2.0-1.el5.x86_64 > heartbeat-3.0

[Pacemaker] Frustrating fun with Pacemaker / CentOS / Apache

I've been hitting my head against the same brick wall all day today and its really beginning to get frustrating. Overview: two test servers straight forward CentOS-5.4 servers running Apache, and pacemaker on top of OpenAIS. I've used one of the documented setups as the template, with a VIP

[Pacemaker] cib and attrd processes segfault

Hi all, we have just installed the latest versions of pacemaker/corosync software: cluster-glue-1.0.3-1.el5.x86_64 cluster-glue-libs-1.0.3-1.el5.x86_64 corosync-1.2.0-1.el5.x86_64 corosynclib-1.2.0-1.el5.x86_64 heartbeat-3.0.2-2.el5.x86_64 heartbeat-libs-3.0.2-2.el5.x86_64 pacemaker-1.0.7-4.el5.x

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration over other NIC

thx Florian. so... if I understood u right... the feature is not realized yet?! I thought or hoped that I only haven't found the right description up to now. the cluster-communication depends on the bcast/mcast-entries in ha.cf? or did you mean an other entry? My file ha.cf looks so: *

Re: [Pacemaker] Breaking pacemaker

Hi, On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 03:04:26PM +0100, jimbob palmer wrote: > 2010/2/16 Dominik Klein : > > jimbob palmer wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have a cluster that is all working perfectly. Time to break it. > >> > >> This is a two node master/slave cluster with drbd. Failover between > >> the nod

Re: [Pacemaker] Breaking pacemaker

2010/2/16 Dominik Klein : > jimbob palmer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have a cluster that is all working perfectly. Time to break it. >> >> This is a two node master/slave cluster with drbd. Failover between >> the nodes works backwards and forwards. Everything is happier than a >> well fed cat. >> >>

Re: [Pacemaker] Breaking pacemaker

jimbob palmer wrote: > Hello, > > I have a cluster that is all working perfectly. Time to break it. > > This is a two node master/slave cluster with drbd. Failover between > the nodes works backwards and forwards. Everything is happier than a > well fed cat. > > I wanted to see what would happen

[Pacemaker] Breaking pacemaker

Hello, I have a cluster that is all working perfectly. Time to break it. This is a two node master/slave cluster with drbd. Failover between the nodes works backwards and forwards. Everything is happier than a well fed cat. I wanted to see what would happen if the drbd device couldn't be mounted

Re: [Pacemaker] RHEL 5.4 + pacemaker broken?

2010/2/10 Andrew Beekhof : > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:20 PM, jimbob palmer wrote: >> 2010/2/8 jimbob palmer : I get this message, but I don't think the pacemaker part is working at all. If I run crm_mon, I get "Attemping connection to the cluster.." So it looks brok

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration over other NIC

On 2010-02-16 13:06, Ingmar wrote: > I have 2 questions: > > - I have a cluster with KVM, heartbeat, pacemaker (with gui) on CentOS 5.4. > I'd like to put the migration path for the VMs from the first NIC to > another. > I have seen that there is a parameter ... However, I do not > know how I wo

[Pacemaker] Migration over other NIC

I have 2 questions: - I have a cluster with KVM, heartbeat, pacemaker (with gui) on CentOS 5.4. I'd like to put the migration path for the VMs from the first NIC to another. I have seen that there is a parameter ... However, I do not know how I would implement in the RA (Virtual Domain OCF heart

[Pacemaker] on fail standby with migration-threshold

Hi all, I'm trying to have this configuration on my 2 nodes test cluster : * After two failures on a resource, standby the node and move the resource away. In fact this : primitive APACHE ocf:me:apache \ params url="http://localhost/server-status"; \ op monitor interval="10s" tim