Re: [Pacemaker] gfs2: ping_pong test fails

2010-02-24 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 22.02.2010 21:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote: Wait a second, thats not right. You want: primitive gfsd ocf:pacemaker:controld params daemon=gfs_controld.pcmk args=-g 0 op monitor interval=120s Doesn't one need both regular dlm_controld.pcmk and gfs_controld.pcmk? :) Anyway, my

Re: [Pacemaker] gfs2: ping_pong test fails

2010-02-24 Thread Ante Karamatić
On 22.02.2010 21:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote: Wait a second, thats not right. You want: primitive gfsd ocf:pacemaker:controld params daemon=gfs_controld.pcmk args=-g 0 op monitor interval=120s Doesn't one need both regular dlm_controld.pcmk and gfs_controld.pcmk? :) Anyway, my

Re: [Pacemaker] gfs2: ping_pong test fails

2010-02-24 Thread Ante Karamatić
Sorry for double posts. :/ ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Re: [Pacemaker] [SOLVED] fence-peer helper broken, returned 1

2010-02-24 Thread Patrick Zwahlen
Hi Lars, I can confirm that the fencing script that ships with DRBD 8.3.7 can cope with DC election timeouts (even with default values in my case). Thanks again for the pointer. - Patrick - -Original Message- From: Lars Ellenberg [mailto:lars.ellenb...@linbit.com] Sent: mardi 23

Re: [Pacemaker] gfs2: ping_pong test fails

2010-02-24 Thread Andrew Beekhof
2010/2/24 Ante Karamatić iv...@grad.hr: On 22.02.2010 21:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote: Wait a second, thats not right. You want: primitive gfsd ocf:pacemaker:controld      params daemon=gfs_controld.pcmk args=-g 0      op monitor interval=120s Doesn't one need both regular dlm_controld.pcmk

[Pacemaker] Stop all resource on failed node

2010-02-24 Thread Alen Bašić
Hello, I have this problem on my pacemaker(v.1.0.7) + openais (v.1.1) instalation (CentOS v.5.4). I would like to stop all or some resources (all resources are ocf class) on failed node! THX ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org

Re: [Pacemaker] Stop all resource on failed node

2010-02-24 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Alen Bašić aba...@inge-mark.hr wrote: Hello, I have this problem on my pacemaker(v.1.0.7) + openais (v.1.1) instalation (CentOS v.5.4). I would like to stop all or some resources (all resources are ocf class) on failed node! define failed

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-State Resources and failback ?

2010-02-24 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:00 PM, r...@free.fr wrote: Hi all, Today, I'm trying a MS set on my two nodes cluster : primitive TEST ocf:me:mysql \        op monitor interval=10s role=Master timeout=10s \        op monitor interval=11s role=Slave timeout=10s \        meta

Re: [Pacemaker] All dependend resources are restarted when Clone Set changes status on ONE machine

2010-02-24 Thread Sebastian Urban
Sorry to bump this up, but I think it is an important point... On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 21:14 +0100, Sebastian Urban wrote: Hi. Here is my config: node cipvm1 \ attributes standby=off node cipvm2 \ attributes standby=off primitive ciptest

Re: [Pacemaker] Stop all resource on failed node

2010-02-24 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Please keep all emails on the list. On Feb 24, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Alen Bašić wrote: On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 14:18 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: define failed well, if network is down or some of resources fail and unable to restart on node1, failover will occur and node2 will be active, but

Re: [Pacemaker] All dependend resources are restarted when Clone Set changes status on ONE machine

2010-02-24 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Sebastian Urban urban...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry to bump this up, but I think it is an important point... And I replied to it 2 days ago... ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org

Re: [Pacemaker] One instance of a multistate resource unexpectedly stopped (hbreport attached)

2010-02-24 Thread Andrew Beekhof
A bug would be preferable (things are too easily lost on mailing lists). I dont think your constraint will work as-is if there are more than 2 nodes, but it also shouldn't be causing the instances to stop. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Florian Haas florian.h...@linbit.com wrote: Andrew, I

Re: [Pacemaker] About the wrong calculation of the value of expected vote.

2010-02-24 Thread Andrew Beekhof
2010/2/24 renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp: Hi, I found a problem of exptected vote by three node constitution. The value of expected vote which I expected was 3. but, expected vote become 2. Sounds like a bug, could I persuade you to make it a bugzilla? I've having trouble keeping track of bugs

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker, openais, Xen, drbd and ocfs2 with Opensuse 11.2

2010-02-24 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Helmut Weymann hel...@h-weymann.de wrote: Please help me to find and/or build the necessary rpms or sources. My current system consists of - two PCs with opensuse 11.2 as dom0. - three paravirtualized domu. Each of them opensuse 11.1 using a drbd device

Re: [Pacemaker] trying to set up sbd stonith

2010-02-24 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2010-02-24T20:53:40, Sander van Vugt m...@sandervanvugt.nl wrote: Hi, STONITH seems to be driving me to feel like SMITH lately, so after unsuccessful attempts to get drac5 and rackpdu to do their work, I'm now focusing on the external/sbd plugin. It doesn't work too well though, so if

Re: [Pacemaker] trying to set up sbd stonith

2010-02-24 Thread Sander van Vugt
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 22:31 +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2010-02-24T20:53:40, Sander van Vugt m...@sandervanvugt.nl wrote: Hi, STONITH seems to be driving me to feel like SMITH lately, so after unsuccessful attempts to get drac5 and rackpdu to do their work, I'm now focusing

Re: [Pacemaker] trying to set up sbd stonith

2010-02-24 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2010-02-24T23:11:13, Sander van Vugt m...@sandervanvugt.nl wrote: Now that seems to help! I've just successfully STONITHed my node :-) Good! ;-) Just one more question: in your documentation you start it as a primitive, not as a clone. Isn't it better to make it a clone - just in case

Re: [Pacemaker] About the wrong calculation of the value of expected vote.

2010-02-24 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, Thank you for comment. I registered a problem on Bugzilla. * http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2359 Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote: 2010/2/24 renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp: Hi, I found a problem of exptected