On 22.02.2010 21:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Wait a second, thats not right. You want:
primitive gfsd ocf:pacemaker:controld
params daemon=gfs_controld.pcmk args=-g 0
op monitor interval=120s
Doesn't one need both regular dlm_controld.pcmk and gfs_controld.pcmk? :)
Anyway, my
On 22.02.2010 21:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Wait a second, thats not right. You want:
primitive gfsd ocf:pacemaker:controld
params daemon=gfs_controld.pcmk args=-g 0
op monitor interval=120s
Doesn't one need both regular dlm_controld.pcmk and gfs_controld.pcmk? :)
Anyway, my
Sorry for double posts. :/
___
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Hi Lars,
I can confirm that the fencing script that ships with DRBD 8.3.7 can cope with
DC election timeouts (even with default values in my case).
Thanks again for the pointer. - Patrick -
-Original Message-
From: Lars Ellenberg [mailto:lars.ellenb...@linbit.com]
Sent: mardi 23
2010/2/24 Ante Karamatić iv...@grad.hr:
On 22.02.2010 21:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Wait a second, thats not right. You want:
primitive gfsd ocf:pacemaker:controld
params daemon=gfs_controld.pcmk args=-g 0
op monitor interval=120s
Doesn't one need both regular dlm_controld.pcmk
Hello,
I have this problem on my pacemaker(v.1.0.7) + openais (v.1.1)
instalation (CentOS v.5.4).
I would like to stop all or some resources (all resources are ocf class)
on failed node!
THX
___
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Alen Bašić aba...@inge-mark.hr wrote:
Hello,
I have this problem on my pacemaker(v.1.0.7) + openais (v.1.1)
instalation (CentOS v.5.4).
I would like to stop all or some resources (all resources are ocf class)
on failed node!
define failed
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:00 PM, r...@free.fr wrote:
Hi all,
Today, I'm trying a MS set on my two nodes cluster :
primitive TEST ocf:me:mysql \
op monitor interval=10s role=Master timeout=10s \
op monitor interval=11s role=Slave timeout=10s \
meta
Sorry to bump this up, but I think it is an important point...
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 21:14 +0100, Sebastian Urban wrote:
Hi.
Here is my config:
node cipvm1 \
attributes standby=off
node cipvm2 \
attributes standby=off
primitive ciptest
Please keep all emails on the list.
On Feb 24, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Alen Bašić wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 14:18 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
define failed
well,
if network is down or some of resources fail and unable to restart on
node1, failover will occur and node2 will be active, but
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Sebastian Urban urban...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry to bump this up, but I think it is an important point...
And I replied to it 2 days ago...
___
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
A bug would be preferable (things are too easily lost on mailing lists).
I dont think your constraint will work as-is if there are more than 2
nodes, but it also shouldn't be causing the instances to stop.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Florian Haas florian.h...@linbit.com wrote:
Andrew,
I
2010/2/24 renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp:
Hi,
I found a problem of exptected vote by three node constitution.
The value of expected vote which I expected was 3.
but, expected vote become 2.
Sounds like a bug, could I persuade you to make it a bugzilla?
I've having trouble keeping track of bugs
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Helmut Weymann hel...@h-weymann.de wrote:
Please help me to find and/or build the necessary rpms or sources.
My current system consists of
- two PCs with opensuse 11.2 as dom0.
- three paravirtualized domu. Each of them opensuse 11.1 using a drbd device
On 2010-02-24T20:53:40, Sander van Vugt m...@sandervanvugt.nl wrote:
Hi,
STONITH seems to be driving me to feel like SMITH lately, so after
unsuccessful attempts to get drac5 and rackpdu to do their work, I'm now
focusing on the external/sbd plugin. It doesn't work too well though, so
if
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 22:31 +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2010-02-24T20:53:40, Sander van Vugt m...@sandervanvugt.nl wrote:
Hi,
STONITH seems to be driving me to feel like SMITH lately, so after
unsuccessful attempts to get drac5 and rackpdu to do their work, I'm now
focusing
On 2010-02-24T23:11:13, Sander van Vugt m...@sandervanvugt.nl wrote:
Now that seems to help! I've just successfully STONITHed my node :-)
Good! ;-)
Just one more question: in your documentation you start it as a
primitive, not as a clone. Isn't it better to make it a clone - just in
case
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
I registered a problem on Bugzilla.
* http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2359
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
2010/2/24 renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp:
Hi,
I found a problem of exptected
18 matches
Mail list logo
