Re: [Pacemaker] 10.8 and pingd problem

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Serge Dubrouski wrote: > Both version of pingd expose the same problem for me. After fresh > start CIB doesn't get updated with pingd attributes for the cluster > nodes so my location rule: > > location connected myGroup \ >        rule $id="connected-rule" -inf: n

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Yan Gao wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote: >> On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Yan Gao wrote: Hi Andrew, On 02/08/10 17:48, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:24

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Yan Gao
On 03/18/10 16:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Yan Gao wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote: >>> On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Yan Gao wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 02/08/10 17:48, Andre

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] Medium: build: require Net-SNMP 5.3 or later

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:17:38AM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: >> Andrew, >> >> now that Pacemaker has been on a bi-monthly release schedule for a >> while, is there any chance you could consider publishing RCs before the >> actua

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] Medium: build: require Net-SNMP 5.3 or later

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
I committed this instead yesterday: http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/81a37efb4384 The packages on clusterlabs.org were built with it. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Florian Haas wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Florian Haas > # Date 1268813453 -3600 > # Branch stabl

Re: [Pacemaker] Help needed crm did not wirte the resources

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
You need to wait until the cluster has fully formed before adding resources. Run "crm_mon" and wait for a DC to be elected, _then_ try adding your resource. And please send logs as attachments next time. ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterl

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote: > On 03/18/10 16:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Yan Gao wrote: >>> Hi Andrew, >>> >>> On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote: On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Yan Gao wro

Re: [Pacemaker] Problem : By colocations limitation, the resource appointment of the combination does not become effective.

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
2010/3/17 : > Hi Andrew, > > Please give my question an answer. I've been extremely busy. Sometimes I defer more complex questions until I have time to give them my full attention. > > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > --- renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Thank you for c

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Yan Gao
On 03/18/10 17:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote: >> On 03/18/10 16:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Yan Gao wrote: Hi Andrew, On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote: > On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:

Re: [Pacemaker] the behavior of clone resource

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
2010/3/16 Junko IKEDA : > Hi, > > There is just a little strange clone behavior. > I found that; > > (1) start the group which contains three primitive resources, >          and clone set > > # crm_mon -1 > > > Last updated: Tue Mar 16 21:39:10 2010 > Stack: openais > Current DC: cspm0

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote: > > > On 03/18/10 17:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote: >>> On 03/18/10 16:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Yan Gao wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 02/23/10 17:23, Ya

[Pacemaker] Design: 8 vs 4x2 nodes Cluster

2010-03-18 Thread martin . braun
Hi there, I want to realize a rather complex setup, so I have a couple of questions: The cluster (as a shared nothing variant) should provide: * 4 services (=server) depending on each other. * 3 of them can only be realized as active/passive failover, synched with DRBD (M/S) * The servers ru

Re: [Pacemaker] clone resource doesn't stop during node standby

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
2010/3/18 Junko IKEDA : > Hi, > > I run the following resources on two node. > > # crm_mon -1 > > > Last updated: Thu Mar 18 11:26:54 2010 > Stack: openais > Current DC: cspm01 - partition with quorum > Version: 1.0.8-2a76c6ac04bc stable-1.0 tip > 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes >

Re: [Pacemaker] Design: 8 vs 4x2 nodes Cluster

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:32 AM, wrote: > Hi there, > I want to realize a rather complex setup, so I have a couple of questions: > > > The cluster (as a shared nothing variant) should provide: > > * 4 services (=server) depending on each other. > * 3 of them can only be realized as active/passiv

Re: [Pacemaker] [Patch showscores.sh]

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
applied. thanks! On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Dominik Klein wrote: > err, yeah. That wasn't right. > > Use this one. > > Regards > Dominik > > Dominik Klein wrote: >> Minor Update. Just noticed it doesn't display stickiness=0 if stickiness >> is unset. So failcound and migration-threshold col

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Yan, On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:12:24PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote: > > On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Yan Gao wrote: > >>> Hi Andrew, > >>> > >>> On 02/08/10 17:48, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Th

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote: > > > > > > On 03/18/10 17:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote: > >>> On 03/18/10 16:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2

Re: [Pacemaker] the behavior of clone resource

2010-03-18 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Junko-san, On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:34:28AM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > Thank you for your advice, > > I removed /usr/etc/logd.cf first, > and set use_logd off in corosync.conf. > > logging setting in corosync.conf is here, > > logging { > fileline: on > to_s

Re: [Pacemaker] ERROR: stonith:external/riloe2: no such resource agent

2010-03-18 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:41:05PM +0100, frank wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 09:20 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > openais or corosync have nothing to do with stonith plugins. > > /etc/ha.d/ha.cf is used by Heartbeat and while it may be used for > > stonith configuration it is usually

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Yan Gao
On 03/18/10 18:30, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote: >> >> >> On 03/18/10 17:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote: On 03/18/10 16:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Yan Gao wrote:

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Yan Gao
Hi Dejan, On 03/18/10 19:23, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi Yan, > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:12:24PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote: >>> On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Yan Gao wrote: > Hi Andrew, >>

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource-Monitoring with an "On Fail"-Action

2010-03-18 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:38:47PM +0100, Tom Tux wrote: > Hi Dejan > > Thanks for your answer. > > I'm using this cluster with the packages from the HAE > (HighAvailability-Extension)-Repository from SLES11. Therefore, is it > possible, to upgrade the cluster-glue from source? Yes, though

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 07:49:04PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > On 03/18/10 19:23, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > Hi Yan, > > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:12:24PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, > >> > >> On 02/23/10 17:23, Yan Gao wrote: > >>> On 02/23/10 04:10, Andrew Beekho

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 03/18/10 17:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Yan Gao wrote: >

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource-Monitoring with an "On Fail"-Action

2010-03-18 Thread Tom Tux
Hi Dejan hb_report -V says: cluster-glue: 1.0.2 (b75bd738dc09263a578accc69342de2cb2eb8db6) I've opened a case by Novell. They will fix this problem with updating to the newest cluster-glue-release. Could it be, that I have another configuration-issue in my cluster-config? I think with the follow

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Yan Gao
On 03/18/10 21:00, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote: On 03/18/10 17:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:00:04PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On 03/18/10 17

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource-Monitoring with an "On Fail"-Action

2010-03-18 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:15:07PM +0100, Tom Tux wrote: > Hi Dejan > > hb_report -V says: > cluster-glue: 1.0.2 (b75bd738dc09263a578accc69342de2cb2eb8db6) Yes, unfortunately that one is buggy. > I've opened a case by Novell. They will fix this problem with updating > to the newest cluster-

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Yan Gao
On 03/18/10 22:54, Yan Gao wrote: > On 03/18/10 21:00, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Yan Gao wrote: > > > On

Re: [Pacemaker] Which Linux to use for cluster

2010-03-18 Thread Pascal Hofmann
Hi List, > Also You have to know that a kernel update last Thursday broke Lennys DRBD > module if you installed 8.0.14 from the usual repositories. I hope they fix > it > in the near future. Afaik this was fixed in an update to DRBD last tuesday. (16th of march) Regards Pascal ___

[Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout

2010-03-18 Thread Ken Dechick
Hi all, Just updated my test cluster to latest 1.0.8 pacemaker (from 1.0.6) and 3.0.2-2 heartbeat (from 3.0.1-1). Was going through my usual configuration steps, when I ran into a warning I have never seen before in setup. I start my bare cluster and co cmd-line configuring within the crm shell

Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout

2010-03-18 Thread Glauber Cabral
Hi Kenneth I'm new to pacemaker, but I guess that your problem is that the timeout for start and stop action are set by default to 20s somewhere (it seems it's not defined in your file) and pacemaker is telling you there timeouts are shorter then the recomended ones. So, my suggestion is to defin

Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout

2010-03-18 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Donnerstag, 18. März 2010 21:25:22 schrieb Glauber Cabral: > Hi Kenneth > > I'm new to pacemaker, but I guess that your problem is that the > timeout for start and stop action are set by default to 20s somewhere > (it seems it's not defined in your file) and pacemaker is telling you > there time

Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout

2010-03-18 Thread Andreas Mock
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Michael Schwartzkopff Gesendet: 18.03.2010 21:32:22 An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout >Hi, > >new introduced in 1.0.8. If your resources work you can safely ignore this. > Hi Michael, is this

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:12:24PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote: > After investigating, I found that Unix domain sockets provide methods to > identify the user on the other side of a socket. That means we don't need > PAM to do authentication for local access, and the clients doesn't need > to prompt user

Re: [Pacemaker] Which Linux to use for cluster

2010-03-18 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 07:07:06PM +0100, Pascal Hofmann wrote: > Hi List, > > > Also You have to know that a kernel update last Thursday broke Lennys DRBD > > module if you installed 8.0.14 from the usual repositories. I hope they fix > > it > > in the near future. (releasing a new binary ker

Re: [Pacemaker] Problem : By colocations limitation, the resource appointment of the combination does not become effective.

2010-03-18 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, > I've been extremely busy. > Sometimes I defer more complex questions until I have time to give > them my full attention. I understand that you are busy. Thank you for comment. > I don't really understand the question here. Sorry.. I made a mistake in the link of the former problem.

Re: [Pacemaker] clone resource doesn't stop during node standby

2010-03-18 Thread Junko IKEDA
Hi, # crm_mon -1 Stack: openais Current DC: cspm01 - partition with quorum Version: 1.0.8-2a76c6ac04bc stable-1.0 tip 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes 2 Resources configured. Node cspm02: standby Online: [ cspm01 ] Resource Group: UMgroup01 UmDummy03

[Pacemaker] Problem : Sometimes failed in the start of the guest(on KVM).

2010-03-18 Thread renayama19661014
Hi, I use VirtualDomain-RA and, on KVM, constitute a cluster. However, a guest sometimes fails in start. Mar 16 15:16:52 x3650e lrmd: [13457]: info: RA output: (guest-kvm1:start:stderr) error: Failed to start domain kvm1 error: internal error unable to start guest: inet_listen: bind(ipv4,127.0

Re: [Pacemaker] [SOLVED] Resource-Monitoring with an "On Fail"-Action

2010-03-18 Thread Tom Tux
Hi Thanks a lot for your help. So now it's Novell's turn.:-) Regards, Tom 2010/3/18 Dejan Muhamedagic : > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:15:07PM +0100, Tom Tux wrote: >> Hi Dejan >> >> hb_report -V says: >> cluster-glue: 1.0.2 (b75bd738dc09263a578accc69342de2cb2eb8db6) > > Yes, unfortu

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-18 Thread Yan Gao
On 03/19/10 06:22, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:12:24PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote: >> After investigating, I found that Unix domain sockets provide methods to >> identify the user on the other side of a socket. That means we don't need >> PAM to do authentication for local access,