[Pacemaker] Preventing resource from becoming inactive

2010-08-09 Thread Torsten Bronger
Hallöchen! Sometimes Pacemaker just switches off my Lighttpd. It becomes inactive and is never reanimated. Only restarting the Heartbeat service helps. How can I tell Pacemaker to retry to restart lighttpd without ever giving up? Since I use Lighty as a load balancer, it is tied with my public

Re: [Pacemaker] rsc_order plus resource_set problem

2010-08-09 Thread Michael Fung
Hello Dejan, > > That cannot be the case, because tabs are treated as space. The > problem comes from specifying 'sequential="true"' which, because > default, is not generated hence the original XML and the > generated XML differ. In that case shell will refuse to use its > notation. For instance

Re: [Pacemaker] Processes are being run with realtime priority

2010-08-09 Thread Doug _
Thanks for the info Dejan. I'm using: cluster-glue-1.0.1-1.el5 (which contains lrmd) pacemaker-1.0.7-2.el5 corosync-1.2.0-1.el5 I'll try with the latest stable versions from the 1.0 stream. Thanks, Doug Hi, > > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:17:26PM -0400, Doug _ wrote: > > I'm using Pacemaker an

[Pacemaker] gfs2

2010-08-09 Thread bunkertor
hi to all! i have some problems with cluster and gfs2 mounting on iscsi devices. i followed this guide "http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf"; with some changes depending on my envoironment; so the cluster should connect to iscsi portal, start dlm_controld(.pcmk) and gfs_cont

Re: [Pacemaker] rsc_order plus resource_set problem

2010-08-09 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:57:18PM +0800, Michael Fung wrote: > > On 2010/8/9 下午 07:53, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>

Re: [Pacemaker] rsc_order plus resource_set problem

2010-08-09 Thread Michael Fung
On 2010/8/9 下午 07:53, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > There

Re: [Pacemaker] Unexpected master/slave behavior

2010-08-09 Thread David Mohr
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:41:02 +0200, David Mohr wrote: ... > I opened bug 2464[1] for this issue. > >> Thanks, >> >> Dejan > > Thank you for the quick reply! > > ~David > > [1]: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 I forgot to mention: the bug report has the hb_repo

Re: [Pacemaker] Unexpected master/slave behavior

2010-08-09 Thread David Mohr
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:37:23 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 01:34:16PM +0200, David Mohr wrote: ... >> * 2 nodes, >> * drbd in a primary/secondary setup, >> * an IP address that's supposed to be up on the drbd master. ... >> First we tried to move the master_ip

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker in rhel6

2010-08-09 Thread Vadym Chepkov
On Aug 9, 2010, at 3:59 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > yes, its fixed in -6 > I wasn't able to find "updates" repository for rhel6. Is it available? > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It seems pacemaker is broken in rhel6-beta2 >> >> # rpm -q pacemaker >> pace

Re: [Pacemaker] Unexpected master/slave behavior

2010-08-09 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 01:34:16PM +0200, David Mohr wrote: > > Hi everyone, > we are trying to understand how pacemaker deals with master/slave > resources. After reading the documentation we believe we understand how > location and colocation work. Yet in practice we don't get the results t

Re: [Pacemaker] rsc_order plus resource_set problem

2010-08-09 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:00:37PM +0800, Michael Fung wrote: > Hello again, > > I have a long list of resources that must be started in order, so I > followed the "Pacemaker 1.0 Configuration Explained" doc, to write it > like that: > > (the constraints scope was originally blank as ) > >

[Pacemaker] Unexpected master/slave behavior

2010-08-09 Thread David Mohr
Hi everyone, we are trying to understand how pacemaker deals with master/slave resources. After reading the documentation we believe we understand how location and colocation work. Yet in practice we don't get the results that we expect. We experimented with a minimal setup: * 2 nodes, * drbd in

Re: [Pacemaker] Processes are being run with realtime priority

2010-08-09 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:17:26PM -0400, Doug _ wrote: > I'm using Pacemaker and Corosync, and I notice that all my cluster resources > are started with realtime priority. How do I lower this to more normal > process priorities? It should be done automatically by lrmd. At one point this fun

[Pacemaker] August Vacation

2010-08-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Hi All, Just a quick note to let people know that I'll be away from email for the next 3 weeks. There are plenty of knowledgable people on the list that can help but please be patient for anything that needs an answer from me directly. See you all in September :-) -- Andrew

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker in rhel6

2010-08-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
yes, its fixed in -6 On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > Hi, > > It seems pacemaker is broken in rhel6-beta2 > > # rpm -q pacemaker > pacemaker-1.1.2-5.el6.x86_64 > > # crm configure load replace crm.cfg > crm_standby not available, check your installation > > And it's true, cr