Hi,
I'm once again experiencing (imho) strange behaviour respectively
decision-making by Pacemaker, and I hope that someone can either
enlighten me a little about this, its intention and/or a possible
misconfiguration or something, or confirm it a possible bug.
Basically I have a cluster of
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 05:17:03PM -0300, Diego Woitasen wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2010/8/2 Dejan Muhamedagic :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 07:09:11PM -0300, Diego Woitasen wrote:
> >> 2010/7/16 Diego Woitasen :
> >> > Hi,
> >> > I've installed Heartbeat+Pacemaker (3.0.3 and 1.0.9). I have
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 August 2010 23:55:42 Bart Coninckx wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 August 2010 23:01:22 Vince Gabriel wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Bart Coninckx [mailto:bart.conin...@telenet.be]
> > > > Sent
On Wednesday 11 August 2010 23:55:42 Bart Coninckx wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 August 2010 23:01:22 Vince Gabriel wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Bart Coninckx [mailto:bart.conin...@telenet.be]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 10:49 AM
> > > To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
On Wednesday 11 August 2010 23:01:22 Vince Gabriel wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bart Coninckx [mailto:bart.conin...@telenet.be]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 10:49 AM
> > To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> > Subject: [Pacemaker] Temporarely suspending monitoring
> >
> > H
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:11:45PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 11.08.2010 22:09, patrick.ouel...@promutuel.ca пишет:
> > First of all, wow guys great software I love it so far.
> >
> > Second, I hope im posting this at the right place or i'll get flamed.
> >
> > I have followed the great
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Coninckx [mailto:bart.conin...@telenet.be]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 10:49 AM
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Temporarely suspending monitoring
>
> Hi,
>
> We're using the Xen resource agents with an operation "moni
Hi everyone,
I have new cluster that is works exceptionally well with the exception
of the IPaddr2 virtual interfaces initiated failovers. If the interface
is downed or cable disconnected, a failover never happens. I've
attempted to incorporate pingd however that has not helped either? It's
my un
Hi
2010/8/2 Dejan Muhamedagic :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 07:09:11PM -0300, Diego Woitasen wrote:
>> 2010/7/16 Diego Woitasen :
>> > Hi,
>> > I've installed Heartbeat+Pacemaker (3.0.3 and 1.0.9). I have a
>> > resource which executes an script to check the service:
>> >
>> > primitive kol
11.08.2010 22:09, patrick.ouel...@promutuel.ca пишет:
> First of all, wow guys great software I love it so far.
>
> Second, I hope im posting this at the right place or i'll get flamed.
>
> I have followed the great document by Andrew Cluster from scratch
> but since im using more recent versio
First of all, wow guys great software I love it so far.
Second, I hope im posting this at the right place or i'll get flamed.
I have followed the great document by Andrew Cluster from scratch
but since im using more recent version of the software im stuck
at adding OCFS2 support to the cluster
Hi,
We're using the Xen resource agents with an operation "monitor" that repeats
every 60 seconds.
For backing up the Xen machines, we use "xm save" and "xm restore" which takes
them offline for a short amount of time (and copies the memory contents to a
file). Of course, when the monitor chec
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:48:17AM +0200, philipp.achmuel...@arz.at wrote:
> i removed the clone, set the global cluster property for stonith-timeout.
>
> the nodes need about 3-5 minutes to startup after they get "shot"
>
> i did some more tests and found out that if the node, which runs re
i removed the clone, set the global cluster property for stonith-timeout.
the nodes need about 3-5 minutes to startup after they get "shot"
i did some more tests and found out that if the node, which runs resource
sbd_fence, get "shot" the remaining node see the stonith resource online
on both
>> any ideas on the "unrunnable" problem?
>That's expected: one can't run operations on a node which is offline.
i would expect a failover of the resources to node lnx0047b. since
lnx0047a is stonith'ed, the resources should start on remaining node.
>> any ideas on the stonith problem?
> We'd ne
On 2010-08-10T10:16:05, philipp.achmuel...@arz.at wrote:
> primitive sbd_fence stonith:external/sbd \
> params sbd_device="/dev/hdisk-4652-38b5" stonith-timeout="60s"
> clone fence sbd_fence \
> meta target-role="Started"
Like Dejan said, you shouldn't run it as a clone, but this
16 matches
Mail list logo
