On 8 October 2010 08:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Pavlos Parissis
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7 October 2010 09:01, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Pavlos Parissis
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I am having again the same issue, in a diffe
On 8 October 2010 07:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis
> wrote:
>> On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra
>>> > wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Pavlos Parissis
wrote:
>
>
> On 7 October 2010 09:01, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Pavlos Parissis
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am having again the same issue, in a different set of 3 nodes. When I
>> > try
>> > to failover manuall
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis
wrote:
> On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra
>> > wrote:
>> >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this qu
On 8 October 2010 04:26, jiaju liu wrote:
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 21:58:29 +0200
> From: Pavlos Parissis
> http://cn.mc157.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pavlos.paris...@gmail.com>
> >
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
>
> http://cn.mc157.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=p
lcount
1.1 or 1.2 branch?
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20101007/ce6d0b4e/attachment-0001.htm>
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pa
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
> Funnily enough I was just looking at that message and saw that the
> code relevant to this one looked wrong too.
>
> I believe this should fix the issue:
>http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/rev/e06810256413
>
> >
> > I registered log and more with Bu
Hi,
Description of my environment:
corosync=1.2.8
pacemaker=1.1.3
Linux= 2.6.29.6-0.6.smp.gcc4.1.x86_64 #1 SMP
We are having a problem with our pacemaker which is continuously
canceling the monitoring operation of our stonith devices.
We ran:
stonith -d -t external/safe/ipmi hostname=
On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra
> > wrote:
> >> That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question.
> >>
> >
> > On June, inside a complex thread regarding "
On 7 October 2010 09:01, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Pavlos Parissis
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am having again the same issue, in a different set of 3 nodes. When I
> try
> > to failover manually the resource group on the standby node, the ms-drbd
> > resource is not
Yesterday, the last few emails between Vadym and I were inadvertently
not posted to this list. Here are those posts for anyone having
similar issues.
Regards,
Craig.
On 7 October 2010 15:20, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
> no, default is 0 - it is not taken into consideration at all.
> Resource stays in
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ron Kerry wrote:
> On 10/7/2010 8:00 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:49:05AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
>> wrot
On 10/7/2010 8:00 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:49:05AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:18:37AM +0200,
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 01:32:06PM -0400, Shravan Mishra wrote:
> Please fine hb_report.
hb_report couldn't find the logs, probably because you have both
syslog and to file logging. Anyway, it could be that stuff such
as external/safe/ipmi cannot work, i.e. that you can't create
subdirectorie
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:52:16AM -0400, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
>
> On Sep 30, 2010, at 2:35 AM, Sascha Reimann wrote:
>
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> > it's working fine with the amount of free ram as the score and a bigger
> > default-resource-stickiness:
> >
> > primitive v01 ocf:heartbeat:Xen \
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:09:38AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Phil Armstrong wrote:
> >> From Andrew Beekof
> >> 1.1.3 came out the other day.
> >> which distro are you using?
> >
> > I'm not sure if this answers your question:
> >
> > novell/sles/updates/SLE11
I have solved the problem.
There was an error in corosync.conf in a section before the logging
section so that the logging section was'nt interpreted correctly.
Thank you!
-
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Keisuke MORI wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> 2010/9/23 Andrew Beekhof :
>> Pushed as:
>> http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/rev/8433015faf18
>>
>> Not sure about applying to 1.0 though, its a dramatic change in behavior.
>
> I would like to backport this to 1.0.
> Woul
Andrew,
2010/9/23 Andrew Beekhof :
> Pushed as:
> http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/rev/8433015faf18
>
> Not sure about applying to 1.0 though, its a dramatic change in behavior.
I would like to backport this to 1.0.
Would you agree with this?
Without this the failed node was not fenced
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
> hi all,
>
> do you have any further information, eta, repository, etc. in
> regard of the backported patches from 1.1 to 1.0?
I saw a bunch go into stable-1.0 the other day, so I think they're done.
I just need to find some time to do
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 11:16 AM, Keisuke MORI wrote:
>> This should have been fix with this:
>> http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/5fe02f48c47b
>>
>> The patch has been already backported to the 1.0 repository and will
>> be incl
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:49:05AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:18:37AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >> Dejan: looks like so
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:49:05AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:18:37AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> Dejan: looks like something in the lrm library.
> >> Any idea why the message doesn't cont
On 10/06/2010 11:16 AM, Keisuke MORI wrote:
> This should have been fix with this:
> http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/5fe02f48c47b
>
> The patch has been already backported to the 1.0 repository and will
> be included in 1.0.10.
> Will you test with the tip of 1.0 repository if y
hi all,
do you have any further information, eta, repository, etc. in
regard of the backported patches from 1.1 to 1.0?
i would be very interested in tracking them :)
thanks,
raoul
--
DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc. email.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:44 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We tested complicated node trouble.
>
> An error of "Election Timeout" occurred then.
>
> * Pacemaker:pacemaker-1.0.9.1
> * heartbeat-3.0.3-2.3.el5
> * cluster-glue:cluster-glue-1.0.6-1.6.el5
> * resource-agents-1.0.3-1.0.dev.b7a3b1973ba7
>
> W
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Ivo Rodrigues wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm trying to make activeMQ working on pacemaker (master/slave) with DRBD
> for the kahaDB. This way, if a node goes down the second will step up.
>
> I created a symbolic link for activemq start script on etc/init.d/ and
> de
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:39 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I operated the next to confirm the contribution of the mailing list.
>
> * http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/66939
>
>
> Step1) I prepare cib.xml having monitor which set start-delay than five
> minutes..
> Step2) I start tw
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:18:37AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> Dejan: looks like something in the lrm library.
>> Any idea why the message doesn't contain lrm_opstatus?
>
> Becase this monitor operation never run. Which seems t
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Koch, Sebastian
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>
>
> thanks for your answer. I still need syslog-ng to restart on all nodes after
> the ClusterIp moved. I tried it like this:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Resource:
>
> primitive res_SyslogNG lsb:syslog-ng \
>
> op monitor interval
Could you look for "CRM Hg Version:" in the logs please?
Perhaps the logging macro was broken in that version. Strange.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Eberhard Kuemmerle
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use pacemaker 1.1.2.1 + corosync 1.2.1 (on openSuse 11.3).
>
> Logging is configured in corosync.conf as f
Applied: http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/rev/675c88f7546a
Thanks to you both.
2010/10/4 Ante Karamatić :
> Hi
>
> This patch solves slow responses from remote nodes. Author is Al Stone
> (in CC); he's not on the list as far as I know.
>
> I've tested the patch and it does do the trick. Wit
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Pavlos Parissis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having again the same issue, in a different set of 3 nodes. When I try
> to failover manually the resource group on the standby node, the ms-drbd
> resource is not moved as well and as a result the resource group is not
> fully
33 matches
Mail list logo
