Hi All,
We tested it about the recovery procedure from the state that a node was
divided.
(As for four nodes, three nodes are active, and one node is constitution of the
standby.)
It is the restoration from a state divided by two nodes that we set in
no-quorum-policy="freeze".
The resource ke
I running with Pacemaker 1.0.9.1 and Corosync 1.2.7.
I have a simple config below where colocation seems to have the opposite effect.
Note that if you force myprim's location then mystateful's Master will
colocate correctly.
The command I use to force is: location myprim-loc myprim -inf:
node-not-t
Well, the m/s shutdown ordering problem was of course caused
by mistake in configuration..
my order constrains looked like this:
order ord-drbd-sata0-dlm inf: ms-drbd-sata0:promote cl-dlm
instead of correct:
order ord-drbd-sata0-dlm inf: ms-drbd-sata0:promote cl-dlm:start
so if anybody has simil
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:28:35PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> You're wanting to run multiple instances of pacemaker on a single node?
> That's unlikely to work.
>
> Why not use a vm instead?
linux containers would probably be the most lightweight virtualization
for that purpose, and works gre
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 19:53:27 Vadim S. Khondar wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> How can I take the resource back into managed state after it becomes
> unmanaged due to error?
>
> For example, I have following situation:
>
> crm(live)# status
>
> Last updated: Wed Nov 3 20:23:5
Hello everyone.
How can I take the resource back into managed state after it becomes
unmanaged due to error?
For example, I have following situation:
crm(live)# status
Last updated: Wed Nov 3 20:23:58 2010
Stack: Heartbeat
Current DC: ha-3 (a1ad8f56-7eb0-4aec-8d32-83e283903879) - p
in instance gets killed by the ALRM signal. The signal
> >> should've been caught, but there is something wrong with the
> >> registration of the signal handler.
> >>
> >> Looks like this fails unexpectedly:
> >>
> >> #if !defined(HAVE_POSIX
plugin instance gets killed by the ALRM signal. The signal
>> should've been caught, but there is something wrong with the
>> registration of the signal handler.
>>
>> Looks like this fails unexpectedly:
>>
>> #if !defined(HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS)
>>
>&g
On 3 November 2010 14:26, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
> Hi, I'm planning to run a PDC/BDC Samba pair with HA file service
> (active/passive with DRBD). Would it be possible to have the second
> node running SAMBA as a BDC and once the primary node fails, stop the
> BDC resource and start the PDC resource
You're wanting to run multiple instances of pacemaker on a single node?
That's unlikely to work.
Why not use a vm instead?
On 10/29/10, Alan Jones wrote:
> Has anyone configured pacemaker to simulate multiple nodes with multiple
> process instances?
> Ideally, I'd like to bind corosync daemons t
Hi, I'm planning to run a PDC/BDC Samba pair with HA file service
(active/passive with DRBD). Would it be possible to have the second
node running SAMBA as a BDC and once the primary node fails, stop the
BDC resource and start the PDC resource on the remaining node?
Regards,
--
Ciro Iriarte
http
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 05:20:07PM -0600, Rick Cone wrote:
> Dejan,
>
> I tested the AP7900 with the stonith command turning 2 outlets with the same
> name on and off (about 20 times), and I can't get it to fail. I'm not sure
> what to think, I guess. Perhaps I'll just use 1 outlet with the
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:15:56PM -0400, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> > Right now, I don't have a solution for this problem using
> > clones if you're running pacemaker v1.0.x.
>
> I went ahead and created two sets of Route resources. Each one has to
> go into a separate routing table to p
On 2 November 2010 22:57, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:07:17PM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>> On 2 November 2010 16:15, Dan Frincu wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I am trying to figure out how I can resolve the following scenari
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 06:45:08PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:26:40PM +0100, Eberhard Kuemmerle wrote:
> > On 2 Nov 2010 16:15 02.11.2010 16:18, Eberhard Kuemmerle wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > here is what you requested:
> > >
> > > TEST 1:
> > > stonith -t rcd_serial -p
15 matches
Mail list logo
