Hi,
I'm just migrating my recent mon/heartbeat configuration to pacemaker.
The point of interest is the webservice behavior. Before the monitor
checked if the service failed twice within 20 sec, switch to other node
was initiated if this happens. Now I'm trying to configuring the same
behavior
On 02/09/11 22:44, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
hi,
On 09.02.2011 08:43, u.schmel...@online.de wrote:
I don't use ocf:heartbeat:apache because of my special configuration:
apache is active on both nodes, the access is via haproxy, we have an
url http://localhost:80 which accesses the local
On 2011-02-11 09:16, Uwe Schmeling wrote:
Hi,
I'm just migrating my recent mon/heartbeat configuration to pacemaker.
The point of interest is the webservice behavior. Before the monitor
checked if the service failed twice within 20 sec, switch to other node
was initiated if this happens.
On: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:54:04 +0100, Lars Ellenberg worte:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 02:48:52PM +0100, Stephan-Frank Henry wrote:
My scenario:
Acive/Passive 2 node cluster (serverA serverB) with Corosync, DRBD
PGSQL.
The resources are configured as Master/Slave and sofar it is fine.
hi,
On 02/09/2011 03:04 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
...
server1 server2
ip1ip2
-virtual-IP---
...
Kamailio should always be running on both servers. Replication of
Registrations is done on SIP
Hi Guys
Could anyone tell me what the difference between (resources)
IPaddr and IPaddr2
and
Apache and Apache2
Is there any advantage to using the *2 resources over the other ones ?
Thanks :-)
___
Pacemaker mailing list:
On 2011-02-11 11:53, paul harford wrote:
Hi Guys
Could anyone tell me what the difference between (resources)
IPaddr and IPaddr2
IPaddr uses ifconfig and is meant to be portable across platforms,
IPaddr uses ip, has more features, but is Linux only.
and
Apache and Apache2
Huh?
Am 11.02.2011 11:27, schrieb Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]:
hi,
On 02/09/2011 03:04 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
...
server1 server2
ip1ip2
-virtual-IP---
...
Kamailio should always be running on both
hi,
On 02/11/2011 03:07 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
...
If everything is fine, then Kamailio should run on both servers.
But for example how should the cluster behave if e.g. Kamailio crashes
and restarting by pacemaker again leads to crashes (e.g. Kamailio has DB
connectivity problems or
Hi Raoul!
Am 11.02.2011 16:13, schrieb Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]:
On 02/11/2011 03:07 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
...
Is there some protection in pacemaker to not endlessly trying to restart
such a broken service?
Or, how should pacemaker behave if Kamailio on the active node crashes.
Shall it just
Hi Florian
i had seen apache 2 in one of the pacemaker mails, it may have been a typo
but i just wanted to check, thanks for your help
paul
On 11 February 2011 11:00, Florian Haas florian.h...@linbit.com wrote:
On 2011-02-11 11:53, paul harford wrote:
Hi Guys
Could anyone tell me what
On 02/11/2011 06:47 PM, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
Additionally I want the virtual-IP to be moved if upstream-connectivity
of a node is broken. Therefore I used ping as below:
primitive extip ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr \
params ip=11.222.32.161 \
op monitor interval=3s
primitive
On 02/11/2011 07:58 PM, paul harford wrote:
Hi Florian
i had seen apache 2 in one of the pacemaker mails, it may have been a
typo but i just wanted to check, thanks for your help
Welcome. And I noticed I left out a 2 in the dumbest of places in my
original reply, but I trust you figured that
13 matches
Mail list logo