On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Stefan Schneebeli
stefan.schneeb...@gmx.ch wrote:
Hi Florian
Thank you for you fast reply!
But I don't get the point why it changes to this behavior. What is the
difference
to migrate a VM alone and together with an IP Address?
Because you can't migrate
On Monday 21 February 2011 10:06:56 Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz t...@huapi.ba.ar
wrote:
Page 14, start OpenAIS on first node
/etc/init.d/corosync start
I've just installed from sid (1.0.10-5) on Ubuntu Lucid.
The init.d script
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
the packages from rpm-next(64bit) for opensuse 11.3 do not install there (at
least true for 1.1.4 and 1.1.5).
Are they on corosync yet?
If so, then they need to fix the pkgconfig file so that:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff
mi...@clusterbau.com wrote:
On Monday 21 February 2011 10:06:56 Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz t...@huapi.ba.ar
wrote:
Page 14, start OpenAIS on first node
/etc/init.d/corosync start
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
the packages from rpm-next(64bit) for opensuse 11.3 do not install there (at
least true for 1.1.4 and 1.1.5).
Are they on corosync yet?
On 2011-02-18T12:28:31, Jody McIntyre jo...@trustcentric.com wrote:
I considered this, but unfortunately it would take a lot of effort. The
existing pgsql resource agent is designed to start and stop postgres,
whereas in this mode I want to switch an already running postgres into
master
Hi,
As I understand it, pacemaker decides on having quorum when
the number of nodes it can talk to is strictly greater than
half of the existing nodes, or 2 * N T .
This has the unfortunate consequence of turning it useless for
N = 2, and less than optimal for any even T.
I would like you to
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz t...@huapi.ba.ar wrote:
Hi,
As I understand it, pacemaker decides on having quorum
Let me stop you there... pacemaker doesn't normally decide this at all.
It doesn't for heartbeat based clusters and once the corosync quorum
plugin is
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 04:00:57PM +0100, Bart Coninckx wrote:
Hi all,
the title says it all - I often get unkown errors while resources are
started, but it's not until I start the resource manually out of the
context I get a clue of what exactly went wrong. Sometimes it's loud and
Andrew Beekhof @ 21/02/2011 11:01 -0300 dixit:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz t...@huapi.ba.ar wrote:
Hi,
As I understand it, pacemaker decides on having quorum
Let me stop you there... pacemaker doesn't normally decide this at all.
It doesn't for heartbeat based clusters
Hi,
If I have two DRBD resources:
resourceA
resourceB
What's the best way to configure the constraints in pacemaker so that
a tomcat resource, which serves both of them when mounted,
will not be started unless they are both present? My current
configuration (below) fails to migrate correctly
Forgot to add:
RHEL 5.6, pacemaker 1.0.10, drbd 8.3.10, kernel 2.6.18-238.1.1.el5
On 21 February 2011 17:44, Brett Delle Grazie
brett.dellegra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If I have two DRBD resources:
resourceA
resourceB
What's the best way to configure the constraints in pacemaker so that
a
Hi,
On a cluster that is about to go live I see theses warning popping up
quite frequently:
lrmd: [6487]: WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch function for SIGCHLD was delayed
240 ms ( 100 ms) before
+being called (GSource: 0x1542fc0)
That's on Debian/Squeeze, pacemaker-1.0.9 corosync-1.2.1 and
Hello *,
as the various ocf:*:ping[d] incarnations don't meet my specific needs, I
wrote a small RA using ethtool to detect a network link failure, in order to
trigger a failover.
It's a first shot, comments are welcome.
Best regards
Frederik Schüler
ifstatus
Description:
On 02/21/2011 08:00 PM, Frederik Schüler wrote:
Hello *,
as the various ocf:*:ping[d] incarnations don't meet my specific needs,
May I ask why and how?
I
wrote a small RA using ethtool to detect a network link failure, in order to
trigger a failover.
Well, what if the link is up but
Hi,
On Monday 21 February 2011 21:29:19 Florian Haas wrote:
as the various ocf:*:ping[d] incarnations don't meet my specific needs,
May I ask why and how?
ocf:pacemaker:ping works, but takes approx. 25-30s to react at all, and
approx. 40s to complete the failover. But I need an immediate
Hi,
21.02.2011 22:29, Florian Haas wrote:
On 02/21/2011 08:00 PM, Frederik Schüler wrote:
Hello *,
as the various ocf:*:ping[d] incarnations don't meet my specific needs,
May I ask why and how?
I was thinking about writing something similar. I need this in a quite
complex networking setup,
17 matches
Mail list logo
