Re: [Pacemaker] [2/6 V2] Clusters from Scratch, Ch-Installation

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
You need to include comments with the patches - otherwise its not clear _why_ things are changing. The URL fix is fine, but do the html pdf pages render ok with the increased image widths? On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Marcus Barrow mbar...@redhat.com wrote: Attached are patches for the

Re: [Pacemaker] [5/6 V2] Clusters from Scratch, CS-Active-Active

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote: ack with the following change:   s/In Fedora 13, the gfs-pcmk package/Since December 2010, the gfs-pcmk package in Fedora/ and revert this change: -[root@pcmk-1 ~]# userinputyum install -y gfs2-utils gfs2-cluster

Re: [Pacemaker] Should monitor operations be stopped after a resource is unmanaged?

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Ron Kerry rke...@sgi.com wrote: On 7/22/64 2:59 PM, Pavel Levshin wrote: 01.04.2011 18:36, Ron Kerry:   Folks -     Consider a running cluster with all resources managed. We want to stop   and quickly restart a particular resource without impacting other  

Re: [Pacemaker] Clone resource dependency issue - undesired restart of dependent resources

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
2011/4/1 Christoph Bartoschek bartosc...@gmx.de: Andrew Beekhof wrote: You didn't mention a version number... I think you'll be happier with 1.1.5 (I recall fixing a similar issue). I see a similar problem with 1.1.5.  I have a two node NFS server setup. The following happens: 1. The

Re: [Pacemaker] Sending flush op to all hosts for for stale entries

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:08 AM, AP pacema...@inml.weebeastie.net wrote: Hi, I have a whole bunch of attrd_trigger_update's for things that no longer exist as shown below. How do I get rid of them? Most of the resources they pertain to no longer exist and it's beginning to get a mite spammy

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH]Bug 2567 - crm resource migrate should support an optional role parameter

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote: Hi Dejan, On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:24 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:21:40PM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote: Hi, I would like to submit 2 patches of an initial implementation for

Re: [Pacemaker] CRM_MASTER unable to set/get value for Master/Slave resource.

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
odd - which version of pacemaker is this? On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Mike Toler mike.to...@prodeasystems.com wrote: I have a process (BP) that I need to have running on two servers, in a Master/Slave configuration. host_ip_1 is preferable to host_ip_2, so if it is available, the

Re: [Pacemaker] Problem using Pacemaker and jboss

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:57 PM, tariq fillah tariq...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'am trying to add jboss as a resource in pacemaker. I run the following command : configure primitive appserv ocf:heartbeat:jboss params jboss_home=/usr/lib/jboss-5.0.0.GA op monitor depth=0 timeout=240s

Re: [Pacemaker] [RFC PATCH] Try to fix startup-fencing not happening

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Simone Gotti simone.go...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/25/2011 11:10 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Simone Gotti simone.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, When using corosync + pcmk v1 starting both corosync and pacemakerd (and I think also

Re: [Pacemaker] Clone resource dependency issue - undesired restart of dependent resources

2011-04-04 Thread Christoph Bartoschek
Andrew Beekhof wrote: 2011/4/1 Christoph Bartoschek bartosc...@gmx.de: Andrew Beekhof wrote: You didn't mention a version number... I think you'll be happier with 1.1.5 (I recall fixing a similar issue). I see a similar problem with 1.1.5. I have a two node NFS server setup. The

Re: [Pacemaker] [1/6 V2] Clusters from Scratch, Ch-Intro

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Pretty good s/Pacemaker provides the brain (illustrated in red)/Pacemaker provides the brain (illustrated in blue)/ s/messaging and also membership and quorum/messaging, membership and quorum/ s/resources themselves, scripts that start, stop and monitor them/resource scripts that start, stop

Re: [Pacemaker] Clone resource dependency issue - undesired restart of dependent resources

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
2011/4/4 Christoph Bartoschek bartosc...@gmx.de: Andrew Beekhof wrote: 2011/4/1 Christoph Bartoschek bartosc...@gmx.de: Andrew Beekhof wrote: You didn't mention a version number... I think you'll be happier with 1.1.5 (I recall fixing a similar issue). I see a similar problem with 1.1.5.  

Re: [Pacemaker] Fencing order

2011-04-04 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Pavel Levshin pa...@levshin.spb.ru wrote: Hi. Today, we had a network outage. Quite a few problems suddenly arised in out setup, including crashed corosync, known notify bug in DRBD RA

Re: [Pacemaker] Problem using haproxy script

2011-04-04 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 04:04:39PM +, tariq fillah wrote: I followed the steps described there http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=627783 to install and configure haproxy, the script in /etc/init.d/haproxy is the one in this page http://layer1.rack911.com/haproxy/haproxy.init

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH]Bug 2567 - crm resource migrate should support an optional role parameter

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote: On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:05 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote: Hi Dejan, On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:24 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi,

Re: [Pacemaker] double stonith device

2011-04-04 Thread Christian Zoffoli
Il 04/04/2011 14:12, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto: Hi, Hi On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:08:12PM +0200, Christian Zoffoli wrote: Hi to all, I've a cluster with IPMI enabled servers and dual switch rack PDU APC AP7953, each server has 1 PSU connected to APC1 and 1 PSU connected to APC2. I want

Re: [Pacemaker] lrmd: WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch function for S 1000 ms ( 100 ms) before being called

2011-04-04 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 03:21:05PM -0400, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: Hi, * Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm [20110401 09:41]: Hi, On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:52:39AM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: On 30-03-11 21:05, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: A little more than a month

Re: [Pacemaker] double stonith device

2011-04-04 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:34:16PM +0200, Christian Zoffoli wrote: Il 04/04/2011 14:12, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto: Hi, Hi On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:08:12PM +0200, Christian Zoffoli wrote: Hi to all, I've a cluster with IPMI enabled servers and dual switch rack PDU APC AP7953,

Re: [Pacemaker] double stonith device

2011-04-04 Thread Christian Zoffoli
Il 04/04/2011 15:46, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto: [cut] Have to revise my statement on IPMI. You can use IPMI, since it does a reset independently on the number of PSU. Sorry for the confusion. I know but sometimes IPMI is not so reliable probably the best way shoud be create a new stonith

Re: [Pacemaker] double stonith device

2011-04-04 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Christian Zoffoli wrote: Il 04/04/2011 15:46, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto: [cut] Have to revise my statement on IPMI. You can use IPMI, since it does a reset independently on the number of PSU. Sorry for the confusion. I know but sometimes IPMI

Re: [Pacemaker] double stonith device

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Daugherity
Christian Zoffoli czoffoli@... writes: Hi to all, I've a cluster with IPMI enabled servers and dual switch rack PDU APC AP7953, each server has 1 PSU connected to APC1 and 1 PSU connected to APC2. I want to add stonith to my cluster configuration ...mainly corosync + clvm + ocfs2 ...so

Re: [Pacemaker] [1/6 V2] Clusters from Scratch, Ch-Intro

2011-04-04 Thread Lon Hohberger
- Original Message - Attached are patches for the Introduction chapter of Clusters From Scratch. General: * Clarifies some things; ex: preface seemed to say we wouldn't be using the crm tool, then we used it extensively. Comments: * ...resources and services under it's control...:

Re: [Pacemaker] [3/6 V2] Clusters from Scratch, CS-Verification

2011-04-04 Thread Lon Hohberger
- Original Message - ack ++ -- Lon ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started:

Re: [Pacemaker] [1/6 V2] Clusters from Scratch, Ch-Intro

2011-04-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Lon Hohberger l...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - Attached are patches for the Introduction chapter of Clusters From Scratch. General: * Clarifies some things; ex: preface seemed to say we wouldn't be using the crm tool, then we used it

Re: [Pacemaker] [4/6 V2] Clusters from Scratch, CS-Active-Passive

2011-04-04 Thread Lon Hohberger
- Original Message - Attached are patches for the Active - Passive chapter of Clusters From Scratch. -tiny- (as in, might not be worth doing: * In some circumstances: Since you're fixing it anyway, I think circumstances needs a comma after it. -- Lon

Re: [Pacemaker] [5/6 V2] Clusters from Scratch, CS-Active-Active

2011-04-04 Thread Lon Hohberger
- Original Message - ack with the following change: ++ -- Lon ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started:

Re: [Pacemaker] [6/6 V2] Clusters from Scratch, CS-Stonith

2011-04-04 Thread Lon Hohberger
- Original Message - Attached are patches for the Stonith chapter of Clusters From Scratch. Andrew's recommendation is right. On-board or in-computer power controllers include (but are not limited to): * IPMI over LAN * IBM's RSA * Dell's DRAC * HP's Integrated Lights-Out (iLO) --

[Pacemaker] How to prevent locked I/O using Pacemaker with Primary/Primary DRBD/OCFS2 (Ubuntu 10.10)

2011-04-04 Thread Mike Reid
All, I am running a two-node web cluster on OCFS2 (v1.5.0) via DRBD Primary/Primary (v8.3.8) and Pacemaker. Everything seems to be working great, except during testing of hard-boot scenarios. Whenever I hard-boot one of the nodes, the other node is successfully fenced and marked ³Outdated² *

Re: [Pacemaker] How to prevent locked I/O using Pacemaker with Primary/Primary DRBD/OCFS2 (Ubuntu 10.10)

2011-04-04 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:34:48PM -0600, Mike Reid wrote: All, I am running a two-node web cluster on OCFS2 (v1.5.0) via DRBD Primary/Primary (v8.3.8) and Pacemaker. Everything seems to be working If you want to stay with 8.3.8, make sure you are using 8.3.8.1 (note the trailing .1), or

Re: [Pacemaker] How to prevent locked I/O using Pacemaker with Primary/Primary DRBD/OCFS2 (Ubuntu 10.10)

2011-04-04 Thread Devin Reade
I ran into a similar behavior with an earlier version of glusterfs on raw disk (not DRBD). In that case it was a bug in gluster that, although the nodes were supposed to be operating in a mirror configuration, the one remaining node would refuse to service requests after the other node was

Re: [Pacemaker] double stonith device

2011-04-04 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2011-04-04T15:34:16, Christian Zoffoli czoff...@xmerlin.org wrote: I cannot connect both PSUs to a single PDU without loosing power source reduncancy (I have dual UPS, dual power lines and so on). Yes. Because the alternative is to lose the ability to fence the node if you lose one of the

Re: [Pacemaker] [Problem]The trouble of the slave node influences a master.

2011-04-04 Thread renayama19661014
Hi All, As a result of having investigated it in various ways, there seemed to be the problem in a version of drbd which we used. The problem was settled when we changed it into drbd8.3.9. The details of the cause are unclear. However, please ignore the report of this email because it was