Hi,
I want to update cluster with new RAs and CIB. New CIB is incompatible
with new RAs and new RAs are incompatible with new CIB. Also I don't
wan't to stop all nodes and start them with an empty CIB. Are there
any correct ways to do it?
--
Evgeniy Ivanov
_
Dear list,
the default subnet mask for an virtual ip (we use the IpAddr2 resource)
seems to be /32. In our setups we use those virtual ip addresses on
active/passive two node cluster setups. I have been asked if that should
not be /24 and why, which I wasn't really sure about.
I just assume that'
Andrew,
Thanks for responding. Comments inline with
From: Andrew Beekhof
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Cc: Bob Schatz
Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 11:23:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Question regarding starting of master/slave resources
and ELEC
On 04/13/2011 03:56 PM, Adam Reiss wrote:
> Thank you for responding Raoul!
>
> I do appreciate any help you could pass along. :)
hi!
i would need the logfiles. please use hb_report to generate a report!
something like:
hb_report -f $start -t $end /root/hb_report_postfix/
where $start is be
On 2011-04-13 11:06, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> just bumping this to be not forgotten.
>
> Actually I'd missed that this was a Pacemaker specific one and
> therefore something I needed to look at :-)
Well considering that a b
hi!
i'm the author of the postfix ra and will take a look in the next
days.
please bear with me and nag me, if i'm not replying back to you...
(i'm currently in the middle of some cluster migrations and haven't
got that much time to check the list)
cheers,
raoul
On 04/08/2011 05:32 PM, Adam Re
Hi
when the "ping" RA configured as
primitive ping ocf:pacemaker:ping timeout="5s"
it throws
[: 5s: integer expression expected
This patch fixes configurations where timeout is configured with a unit
following the number.
hth
Dominik
exporting patch:
# HG changeset patch
# User Dominik Kle
13.04.2011 12:06, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> just bumping this to be not forgotten.
>
> Actually I'd missed that this was a Pacemaker specific one and
> therefore something I needed to look at :-)
>
>> RA runs fine for almost
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 01:38:12PM -0500, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It seems crm shell can't express sequential="true" in collocating sets,
>>> which is
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just bumping this to be not forgotten.
Actually I'd missed that this was a Pacemaker specific one and
therefore something I needed to look at :-)
> RA runs fine for almost a month, several simulated network outages were
> passe
> Can you file a bug for that?
http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2582
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getti
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Dominik Klein wrote:
>> Were those 7000 pe-inputs all created over that 7 day period? Because
>> that's a transition every 1.44 minutes.
>
> Might be the recheck-interval?
>
> In a cluster of mine I have a recheck-interval of 5 minutes and see a
> new pe-input.bz2
>>> On 4/13/2011 at 04:37 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Tim Serong wrote:
> > On 4/12/2011 at 05:48 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> Here's an example of the before and after. Thoughts?
> >
> > Looks pretty good to me. Certainly easier to understand what's
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
