Re: [Pacemaker] [pacemaker] unable to execute commands like crm configure show.crm resource stop

2011-04-27 Thread Rakesh K
Dejan Muhamedagic writes: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:58:16AM +0530, rakesh k wrote: > > Hi All > > > > I had installed pacemaker,heartbeat on my unix machine, I had created an SSH > > user who can access my unix machine remotely. > > I had given permissions for that user by editing

Re: [Pacemaker] LSB reload instead of stop and start

2011-04-27 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2011-04-27T19:00:57, Viacheslav Biriukov wrote: > I have next configuration of HA cluster: > > primitive P_NGINX lsb:nginx > primitive P_NGINX_IP1 ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 params ip="x.x.x.x" nic="eth0" > ... > group G_NGINX P_NGINX_IP P_NGINX_IP1 P_NGINX_IP2 P_NGINX_IP3 P_NGINX_IP4 > P_NGINX_IP

Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-site support in pacemaker (tokens, deadman, CTR)

2011-04-27 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2011-04-26T23:34:16, Yan Gao wrote: Hi Yan, thanks for the good questions, let's get a discussion started! > >IntroductioN: At LPC 2010, we discussed (once more) that a key feature > >for pacemaker in 2011 would be improved support for multi-site clusters; > >by multi-site, we mean two (or m

Re: [Pacemaker] crm_mon doesn't seem to run daemonized upon interval

2011-04-27 Thread Phil Hunt
So in essence, it rewrites it only if the cluster changes, updates or whatever, so the date showing is the date/time of the last event. That makes sense actually PHIL HUNT AMS Consultant phil.h...@orionhealth.com P: +1 857 488 4749 M: +1 508 654 7371 S: philhu0724 www.orionhealth.c

[Pacemaker] LSB reload instead of stop and start

2011-04-27 Thread Viacheslav Biriukov
I have next configuration of HA cluster: primitive P_NGINX lsb:nginx primitive P_NGINX_IP1 ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 params ip="x.x.x.x" nic="eth0" ... group G_NGINX P_NGINX_IP P_NGINX_IP1 P_NGINX_IP2 P_NGINX_IP3 P_NGINX_IP4 P_NGINX_IP5 P_NGINX_IP6 P_NGINX Often I need to add new dedicated ip addres

Re: [Pacemaker] crm_mon doesn't seem to run daemonized upon interval

2011-04-27 Thread mark - pacemaker list
Hi Phil, On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Phil Hunt wrote: > > Using ocf:heartbeat:clustermon starts up a daemonized crm_mon with the > follwing command: > > /usr/sbin/crm_mon -p /tmp/ClusterMon_ClusterMon.pid -d -i 15 -h > /data/apache/www/html/crm_mon.html > > And it does, indeed write my cr

[Pacemaker] crm_mon doesn't seem to run daemonized upon interval

2011-04-27 Thread Phil Hunt
Using ocf:heartbeat:clustermon starts up a daemonized crm_mon with the follwing command: /usr/sbin/crm_mon -p /tmp/ClusterMon_ClusterMon.pid -d -i 15 -h /data/apache/www/html/crm_mon.html And it does, indeed write my crm_mon.html file. It does not seem to run on the interval at all. It runs

Re: [Pacemaker] Heartbeat over Disk or non IP possible?

2011-04-27 Thread Ulf
>I think that you can run IP over fibre Yes it should be possible, but I never seen anybody using it. >Would a quorum disk be an acceptable solution for you? That may >be easier to implement. This would be a very good enhancement. Cheers, Ulf -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH]Bug 2567 - crm resource migrate should support an optional "role" parameter

2011-04-27 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Holger Teutsch wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 20:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> why? >>         CMD_ERR("Resource %s not moved:" >>                 " specifying --master is not supported for >> --move-from\n", rsc_id); >> > it did not look sensible to me but I

Re: [Pacemaker] Heartbeat over Disk or non IP possible?

2011-04-27 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:15:02PM +0200, Ulf wrote: > Hi, > > I won't call it akademic curiosity. > Let's say you have two rooms with a distance of 5km. In theory both network > connections are completly independent, but in real live there are a lot of > possible reasons, why they are not

Re: [Pacemaker] Heartbeat over Disk or non IP possible?

2011-04-27 Thread Ulf
Hi, I won't call it akademic curiosity. Let's say you have two rooms with a distance of 5km. In theory both network connections are completly independent, but in real live there are a lot of possible reasons, why they are not independent. It might be just a human errors or a technical problem li

Re: [Pacemaker] A question and demand to a resource placement strategy function

2011-04-27 Thread Yuusuke IIDA
Hi, Yan Thank you for good work! I test it. Please wait for a while. Regards, Yuusuke (2011/04/27 13:32), Yan Gao wrote: Hi Yuusuke, On 04/19/11 19:55, Yan Gao wrote: Actually I've been optimizing the placement-strategy lately. It will sort the resource processing order according to the prior

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource Agents 1.0.4: HA LVM Patch

2011-04-27 Thread Ulf
>> During the reboot of a server many distributions do a "vgscan --mknodes", >> which will activate the VG. >Pacemaker checks on startup for all resources on a node if >they're running (started). Yes, that is true. But as mentioned above a vgscan during the boot will activate the VG, which many

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource Agents 1.0.4: HA LVM Patch

2011-04-27 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:40:22AM +0200, Ulf wrote: > Hi, > I'm not sure if inux-ha-...@lists.linux-ha.org will receive this message, as > I'm not subscribed to. It won't, you need to subscribe. > >Can you please elaborate on the benefits this patch would bring. > >Is it supposed to prevent a V

Re: [Pacemaker] how to get pacemaker:ping recheck before promoting drbd resources on a node

2011-04-27 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:57:11PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I need to be able to bring down my network interface (network failure > test) and few seconds later bring it up again. Without my drbd cluster > going nuts and creating split brains. > > I was advised to use ocf

Re: [Pacemaker] Heartbeat over Disk or non IP possible?

2011-04-27 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 09:31:20AM +0200, Ulf wrote: > Hi, > > So it seems not to be possible to do a heartbeat over disk. > Is it planned to introduce such a feature? Why would you want that? Just because some other clusterstack from 19xy supports it, akademic curiosity, or specific usage scenar

Re: [Pacemaker] Removing a 'Faile Action' in crm_mon display

2011-04-27 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:49:59AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Phil Hunt wrote: >> > Had trouble setting up a resource, so it showed a failed action. >> > >> > I was doing 'crm resource cleanu

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource Agents 1.0.4: HA LVM Patch

2011-04-27 Thread Ulf
Hi, I'm not sure if inux-ha-...@lists.linux-ha.org will receive this message, as I'm not subscribed to. >Can you please elaborate on the benefits this patch would bring. >Is it supposed to prevent a VG from being mounted on more than >one node? Following scenario: Shared storage with a VG and a