On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 10:03 AM, KIA posei...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I've found a consistency issue in subj.
In section 1.4.1 DC is Designated Co-ordinator.
In section 2.3 DC is Designated Controller.
In all following occurrences of DC we have been left alone to guess what
it means
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:15 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:03 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:15 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:03 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at
I thought you said you were running 1.1?
May 5 17:09:33 devel1 pacemakerd: [5929]: info: read_config: Reading
configure for stack: corosync
This message is specific to the devel branch.
Update to get the following fix and you should be fine:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:47:29AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:02:01PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu,
Hello.
I think it was some resource fail and it was been lock by failcount or you
got some wrong location score.
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home:
I had 1.1 but Dejan asked my to rebase my patches on devel.
So long story short: devel now works after upgrading to the rev you
mentioned and I got back to working on my patches.
Thanx
Holger
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 10:58 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I thought you said you were running 1.1?
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 13:25 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
...
Remaining diffs seem to be not related to my changes.
Unlikely I'm afraid. We run the regression tests after every commit
and complain loudly if they
