Something to do with ARP tables perhaps?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:43 AM, ppking123 ppking123
wrote:
> Hi,
> I searched the pacemaker mailing list archive but unable to find the
> information (The closest thread that I can find is
> http://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org/msg086
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Uwe Grawert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on RHEL6.1 I tried to configure stonith using the fencing plugins from the
> fence-agents packet. I used the fence_bladecenter agent and it failed. It
> turned out, that Pacemaker adds parameters: option, nodename, port. "port"
> is
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Leonard Smith wrote:
> Andrew,
> Thank yeah I've checked the HTTP logs and I nothing has stood out so
> far. I also switched to the Apache OCF and I'm seeing the same
> behavior.
Did you read up on the status url stuff?
__
Don't you just want a colocation constraint?
Maybe you should back up and explain what you're trying to achieve.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Janec, Jozef wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'm trying configure solution where one resource will be able know where is
> the second located.
> I have config
Dejan,
Thanks ... you are correct ... probably a little Force is acceptable as
a quick-and-dirty fix.
I'll get a bug filed with Novell.
Bob Haxo
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:35 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 06:10:20PM -0700, Bob Haxo wrote:
> > Well, never min
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
> On 29.06.2011 05:28, Arizka Ashar wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> in active-active each node have clone vip..
>>
>> node1 = 1.2.3.4
>> node2 = 5.6.7.8
>> node3 = 9.10.11.12
>> clone vip = 13.14.15.16
>>
>
> honestly, that depends on your n
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 06:10:20PM -0700, Bob Haxo wrote:
> Well, never mind ...
>
> There appears to be an easy fix for this "violate uniqueness for
> parameter" issue with stonith:/external/ipmi. As noted earlier in this
> thread WRT fence_ipmilan, the parmeters in stonith:external/ipmi ha
