aj Patil
> > Systems Department
> > Business Standard Ltd.
> > H3/4, Paragon center,
> > P.B.Marg,
> > Worli
> > Mumbai - 400013
> > India
> >
> > Ph.+91-22-24971924
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> &
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:13 PM, pskrap wrote:
> Devin Reade writes:
>
>>
>> --On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 09:19:33 AM + pskrap
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I have a cluster where some of the resources cannot run on the same node.
>> > All resources must be running to provide a functioning service. Th
gt; and /or its employees as applicable for any loss or damage arising in any
> > way from its use."
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/lis
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Proskurin Kirill
wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 11:00 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Proskurin Kirill
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 25.07.2011 10:10, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
Which packages are you using?
>>>
>>> It is your official source fr
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Would somebody (Andrew?) please bring some light on how exactly
> redefinition of resource is supposed to be handled?
>
> Below is my (rather perfectionistic) vision on this, please correct me
> if/where I'm wrong:
> * If RA
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:00 PM, rakesh wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> I configured a cluster which consists of four nodes,
>
> started Heartbeat/pacemaker on four nodes.
>
> after some point of time 4th nodes gone down unexpectedly and find the
> following error messages while debugging all the log files lik
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Proskurin Kirill
wrote:
> On 07/19/2011 03:22 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Proskurin Kirill
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all.
>>>
>>> I found what I using corosync with pacemaker "ver:0" with installed
>>> pacemaker 1.1.5 - eg with
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Bobbie Lind wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> I am running a 6 node system, 4 of which mount the LUNs for my Lustre file
> system. I currently have 29 LUNs per server set up in 4 Resource Groups. I
> understand the default startup/shudown order of the resource but I was
> w
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Hmm. Interesting. I will investigate.
This is an unfortunate side-effect of my history compression patch.
Since we only store the last successful and last failed operation, we
don't have the md5 of the start operation around to check when
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Yingliang Yang wrote:
> Hi, Andrew
>
> I'd like to know whether the latest version(c86cb93c5a57) of pacemaker codes
> on the site is stable?
Yes. It is.
> If not, how about Pacemaker 1.1.5(01e86afaaa6d)?
>
> BTW, I'd like to know when the version 1.1.6 will get r
On 07/26/2011 11:43 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:36:25AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
>> On 07/20/2011 11:24 AM, Hugo Deprez wrote:
>>> Hello Andrew,
>>>
>>> in fact DRBD was in standalone mode but the cluster was working :
>>>
>>> Here is the syslog of the drbd's split brain :
>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:36:25AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 11:24 AM, Hugo Deprez wrote:
> > Hello Andrew,
> >
> > in fact DRBD was in standalone mode but the cluster was working :
> >
> > Here is the syslog of the drbd's split brain :
> >
> > Jul 15 08:45:34 node1 kernel: [1536023.
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:41:25 +0800
Yingliang Yang wrote:
> 2011/7/22 Dan Urist wrote:
> > I am in the process of trying to write an fping RA, based on the
> > pacemaker ping RA. My impetus for this is that I would like the RA
> > to return success as soon as any ping succeeds; the behavior of
> >
2011/7/22 Dan Urist wrote:
> I am in the process of trying to write an fping RA, based on the
> pacemaker ping RA. My impetus for this is that I would like the RA to
> return success as soon as any ping succeeds; the behavior of linux's
> system ping as used in the standard ping RA is to run COUNT
Hi, Andrew
I'd like to know whether the latest version(c86cb93c5a57) of pacemaker codes
on the site is stable? If not, how about Pacemaker 1.1.5(01e86afaaa6d)?
BTW, I'd like to know when the version 1.1.6 will get released, will it be
the NEAR future?
Best Regards,
Yingliang Yang
___
Hi,
I have configured a multi-state(clone)resource float IP(IP).
It is running on all the configure Nodes.
I am trying to stop it using crm_resource command
crm_resource -r IP:0 -p target-role -v stopped
I am getting this error.
Error performing operation : The object/a
Hello,
On 25.7.11 13:28, Yingliang Yang wrote:
There is a problem in your config.
The score-attribute should be score and its value should be INFINITY.
Thanks, you were correct. The Cluster from Scratch manual uses "inf"
shorthand all the time, so I thought it would work.
Should this kind
gt; http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs:
> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>
>
-- ne
On 07/26/2011 11:00 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Proskurin Kirill
wrote:
25.07.2011 10:10, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
Which packages are you using?
It is your official source from repository I build.
Ok. And did you add the pacemaker configuration options to coro
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Proskurin Kirill
wrote:
> 25.07.2011 10:10, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
>>
>> Which packages are you using?
>
> It is your official source from repository I build.
Ok. And did you add the pacemaker configuration options to corosync's
config file?
> pacemaker-1.1.5
> co
20 matches
Mail list logo