Hi,
sorry for the confusion.
Pacemaker 1.0.10 OK(group resource can failover)
Pacemaker 1.0.11 NG(gruop resource just stop, can not failover)
Pacemaker 1.1 <- the latest hg (gruop resource just stop, can not failover)
By the way, your simulation showed dummy01 restart on bl460g1n13 again,
but du
> Try no-quorum-policy=freeze instead.
I considered this option, but that puts us into a situation where if
node X and Y fail, then resources from them won't be started up on Z.
I would like to (if possible) avoid that -- I want one node to be able
to take on everything.
I realize this may be a p
After digging around in the messages I found the following:
notice: unpack_rsc_op: Operation convirt-drbd:0_monitor_0 found resource
convirt-drbd:0 active on admin01
notice: unpack_rsc_op: Operation convirt-drbd:0_monitor_0 found resource
convirt-drbd:0 active on admin02
admin01 pengine: [3178]:
So, in another thread there was a discussion of using cibadmin to
mitigate possible concurrency issue of crm shell. I have written a test
program to test that theory and unfortunately cibadmin falls down in the
face of heavy concurrency also with errors such as:
Signon to CIB failed: connection f
Here:
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/blob/master/heartbeat/named
Let me know how it works for you.
On Sep 29, 2011 8:25 AM, "Max Williams" wrote:
> Yes I was using the LSB RA. Can you give me a link to the OCF RA on
github?
> Thanks,
> Max
>
> From: Serge Dubrouski [mailto:serge..
Hello all.
corosync-1.4.1
pacemaker-1.1.5
pacemaker runs with "ver: 1"
I run on some problems this week. I not sure if I need to make 3
separate letters, sorry if so.
1)
I set node to standby and then to online. And after this I get this:
2643 root RT 0 11424 2052 1744 R 100.9 0.0 657502:53
Darren,
Please keep us updated on your progress, I am still in the stage of
setting up services and primitives. This
will all be done by the end of this week.
Cheers,
Nick.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:06 AM, wrote:
> Sorry for top-posting, I'm Outlook-afflicted.
>
> This is also my problem; In
Sorry for top-posting, I'm Outlook-afflicted.
This is also my problem; In the full production environment there will be
low-level hardware fencing by means of IBM RSA/ASM but this is a VMware test
environment. The vmware STONITH plugin is dated and doesn't seem to work
correctly (I gave up quic
Hello Dejan,
Sorry to hijack, I am also working on the same type of setup as a prototype.
What is the best way to get stonith included for VM setups? Maybe an
SSH stonith?
Again, this is just for the prototype.
Cheers,
Nick.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Darren
Yes I was using the LSB RA. Can you give me a link to the OCF RA on github?
Thanks,
Max
From: Serge Dubrouski [mailto:serge...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 September 2011 13:19
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Reloading a resource after a failover
What kind of RA you do
Andrew Beekhof writes:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Rainer Weikusat
> wrote:
>> Is there a specific reason why compiler optimization is disabled (line
>> 1323 in configure.ac, '-ggdb3 -O0') when building pacemaker?
>
> Something we inherited from heartbeat I guess - possibly so that stack
>
Hi Darren,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:15:34PM +0100, darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk wrote:
> (Originally sent to DRBD-user, reposted here as it may be more relevant)
>
>
>
>
> Hello all.
>
>
>
> I'm implementing a 2-node cluster using Corosync/Pacemaker/DRBD/OCFS2
> for dual-primary shared F
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:30:55AM -0300, Charles Richard wrote:
> Here it is attached.
>
> I also see the following 2 errors in the node 2 logs which I assume mean the
> problem is really that node1 is not getting demoted and I'm not sure why:
>
> Error 1:
> Sep 28 19:53:20 staging2 drbd[85
(Originally sent to DRBD-user, reposted here as it may be more relevant)
Hello all.
I'm implementing a 2-node cluster using Corosync/Pacemaker/DRBD/OCFS2
for dual-primary shared FS.
I've followed the instructions on the DRBD applications site and it
works really well.
However, if I
(Originally sent to DRBD-user, reposted here as it may be more relevant)
Hello all.
I'm implementing a 2-node cluster using Corosync/Pacemaker/DRBD/OCFS2
for dual-primary shared FS.
I've followed the instructions on the DRBD applications site and it
works really well.
However, if I
Here it is attached.
I also see the following 2 errors in the node 2 logs which I assume mean the
problem is really that node1 is not getting demoted and I'm not sure why:
Error 1:
Sep 28 19:53:20 staging2 drbd[8587]: ERROR: mysqld: Called drbdadm -c
/etc/drbd.conf primary mysqld
Sep 28 19:53:20
What kind of RA you do you use? LSB one doesn't support reload, OCF - does.
You need to get OCF RA from github,.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Max Williams wrote:
> Yes this is what I would like to do. Ideally have named as a clone and
> then have an order like this:
>
> crm(live)configur
Yes this is what I would like to do. Ideally have named as a clone and then
have an order like this:
crm(live)configure# order named-service-clone-after-Cluster_IP inf:
Cluster_IP:start Named_Service:reload
But it gives this error:
ERROR: bad resource action/instance definition: Named_Service:rel
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Fiorenza Meini wrote:
> Hi there,
> I'm working on stonith on my test cluster. It has, to me, a strange
> behaviour: when the condition to fence the other node happens, is it normal
> that both primary/secondary node fences the other one? I thought that the
> prima
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Chris Redekop wrote:
> I'm attempting to set up a master/slave database cluster where the master is
> R/W and the slave is R/O. The master failure scenario works fine (slave
> becomes master, master vip moves over)however when the slave resource
> goes down I
Could you attach /var/lib/pengine/pe-input-3802.bz2 from staging1?
That would tell us why.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Charles Richard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm making some headway finally with my pacemaker install but now that
> crm_mon doesn't return errors any more and crm_verify is clear, I
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here at Bump we currently have our handset traffic routed through a
> single server. For obvious reasons, we want to expand this to
> multiple nodes for redundancy. The load balancer is doing two tasks:
> TLS termination and then d
22 matches
Mail list logo
