On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>> Florian Haas (2):
>> extra: add rsyslog configuration snippet
>> extra: add logrotate configuration snippet
>>
>> configure.ac | 4 +++
>> extra/Makef
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>>> Florian Haas (2):
>>> extra: add rsyslog configuration snippet
>>> extra: add logrotate configuration snippet
>>>
>
Hi Lars,
Hi Andrew,
> If you want it to be between [0, max-1],
> obviously that should be
> while(max > 0 && sequence >= max) {
> sequence -= max;
> }
Thanks!!I try it.
> Though I wonder why not simply:
> if (max == 0)
> return;
> if (sequence > ma
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
Florian Haas (2):
extra: add rsyslog configuration snipp
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:56 AM, wrote:
> Hi Lars,
> Hi Andrew,
>
>> If you want it to be between [0, max-1],
>> obviously that should be
>> while(max > 0 && sequence >= max) {
>> sequence -= max;
>> }
>
> Thanks!!I try it.
>
>> Though I wonder why not simply:
>>
Hi Lars,
Thank you for comments and suggestion.
> > poll([{fd=7, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}, {fd=5,
> > events=POLLIN|POLLPRI}], 3, -1
>
> Note the -1 (infinity timeout!)
>
> So even though the trigger was (presumably) set,
> and the ->prepare() should have returned
Hi Andrew,
Hi Lars,
> >> If you want it to be between [0, max-1],
> >> obviously that should be
> >> while(max > 0 && sequence >= max) {
> >> sequence -= max;
> >> }
The rotation was carried out definitely from 0 to max-1.
> >> Though I wonder why not simply:
> >
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> By "Nuclear", I meant nothing at all from Pacemaker.
Which is not what it does.
> If thats what you want, there's a far easier way to achieve this and
> keep usable logs around for debugging, set facility to none and add a
> logfile.
No
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> By "Nuclear", I meant nothing at all from Pacemaker.
>
> Which is not what it does.
The daemons. The RAs are not "from Pacemaker".
This is why I wrote in my first reply:
"/some/
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:48 AM, wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Hi Lars,
>
>> >> If you want it to be between [0, max-1],
>> >> obviously that should be
>> >> while(max > 0 && sequence >= max) {
>> >> sequence -= max;
>> >> }
>
> The rotation was carried out definitely fro
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Lars Ellenberg
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 04:43:51PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>> I attach strace file when a problem reappeared at the end of last year.
>> I used glue which applied your patch for confirmation.
>>
>> It is the f
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2012 20:08:50 Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:59:13AM +, shashi wrote:
>> > So we have two probable options:
>> > 1. An work around to achieve this tri-state efficiently without changing
>> > p
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Qiu Zhigang wrote:
> Hi, All
>
>
>
> I want to use SBD device as a stonith device in RHCS, but how could I
> configure sbd resource agent?
I don't think you can, it doesn't ship at part of RHCS at this stage.
No idea if that will change.
You'd have to build and in
Hi Andrew,
Hi Lars,
> Its in my private tree so far:
> https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/bfbb73c
>
> It will make its way to clusterlabs when I merge next.
All right!
Many Thanks!
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Mon, 2012/1/16, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:48 AM,
Sorry for not getting to this earlier...
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 09.12.2011 08:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
>> wrote:
>>> 09.12.2011 03:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Vladisl
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 19.12.2011 14:39, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> 09.12.2011 08:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
>>> wrote:
09.12.2011 03:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:32 AM
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:37 PM, wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comment.
>
>> But it should have a subsequent stop action which would set it back to
>> being inactive.
>> Did that not happen in this case?
>
> Yes.
Could you send me the PE file related to this log please?
Jan 6 19:22:01
This is getting into some pretty specific cman knowledge, you might
find more experts on that at linux-clus...@redhat.com
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Patrick H. wrote:
> So I'm trying to setup a cluster with a secondary communication ring in case
> the first ring fails. The cluster operates f
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Reid, Mike wrote:
> I've been doing a lot of testing while I've been learning
> Pacemaker/Heartbeat, DRBD, OCFS2, etc (Nginx, PHP-FPM, Apache…) Below I've
> attached my working CIB, but I worry I am missing something obvious (or
> perhaps going about it incorrectl
16.01.2012 09:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[snip]
>>> At the same time, stonith_admin -B succeeds.
>>> The main difference I see is st_opt_sync_call in a latter case.
>>> Will try to experiment with it.
>>
>> Ys!!!
>>
>> Now I see following:
>> Dec 19 11:53:34 vd01-a cluster-dlm: [2474]: info:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Christian Parpart wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I am also about to evaluate whether or not Pacemaker+Corosync is the
> way to go for our
> infrastructure.
>
> We are currently having about 45 physical nodes (plus about 60 more
> virtual containers)
> with a statically hist
16.01.2012 09:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[snip]
>> At the same time, stonith_admin -B succeeds.
>> The main difference I see is st_opt_sync_call in a latter case.
>> Will try to experiment with it.
>
> /Shouldn't/ matter.
It really looks like it matters.
Can't discuss it at more depth though beca
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:49 AM, thomas polnik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want setup follow:
> 2 servers with multimaster drbd and ocfs filesystem and mount it.
>
> *system: gentoo, 2.6.39, pacemaker-1.1.5
>
> *Setup pacemaker:
>
> # misc settings
> property no-quorum-policy="ignore"
> property stonith-
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
> Could you send me the PE file related to this log please?
>
> Jan 6 19:22:01 rh57-1 crmd: [3461]: info: do_te_invoke: Processing
> graph 4 (ref=pe_calc-dc-1325845321-26) derived from
> /var/lib/pengine/pe-input-4.bz2
The old file disappeared.
I send log and
24 matches
Mail list logo
