On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Eliot Gable wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Eliot Gable
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have also tried doing a resource cleanup on FreeSWITCH-MS, restarting
>> pacemaker and corosync, putting the node in standby and bringing it back
>> out, upgrading pacemaker and
Andrew,
Snipped off the old stuff as this is getting quite large for those that read
via mobile devices ;-)
To answer your question - no not that I am aware of. Maybe someone else on the
list with a better option will speak up.
However if your really only looking to make sure the node runni
Hi Jake,
Thank you for the detailed analysis of this problem. The original reason I was
utilizing ocf:pacemaker:ping was to ensure that the node with the best network
connectivity (network connectivity being judged by the ability to communicate
with 192.168.0.128 and 192.168.0.129) would be th
On 2012-08-27T10:10:06, Eliot Gable wrote:
> I was not; but now I am setting the final score on successful start. I am
> calculating the score by using the monitor actions. For each portion of
> monitoring which returns successful, I am adding 10 to the score. The final
> score set should be 40.
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Martin"
> To: "Jake Smith" , "The Pacemaker cluster resource
> manager"
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 1:01:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Loss of ocf:pacemaker:ping target forces
> resources to restart?
>
> Jake,
>
>
> Attached is t
On 08/23/2012 05:26 PM, Jake Smith wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "David Parker"
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:47:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Issues with HA cluster for mysqld
On 08/23/2012 04:19 PM, Jake Smith wrote:
Okay, I think I've al
Jake,
Attached is the log from the same period for node2. If I am reading this
correctly, it looks like there was a 7 second difference between when node1 set
its score to 1000 and when node2 set its score to 1000?
Aug 22 10:40:38 node1 attrd_updater: [1860]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
p_
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Martin"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 7:36:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Loss of ocf:pacemaker:ping target forces resources
> to restart?
>
> Hi Florian,
>
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I ga
I was not; but now I am setting the final score on successful start. I am
calculating the score by using the monitor actions. For each portion of
monitoring which returns successful, I am adding 10 to the score. The final
score set should be 40. However, it is still not working. Any other
suggestio
On 2012-08-26T11:44:52, Eliot Gable wrote:
> Looking back through my E-mails, it looks like this was originally deployed
> on 1.1.2. My guess is that someone did a sweeping software update on the
> system but never restarted/reloaded pacemaker + corosync until that reboot
> occurred last week. Di
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:25:19AM -0400, Nathan Bird wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 10:47 AM, Nathan Bird wrote:
> >I'm trying to setup an external/libvirt stonith fencing
> >thingiemadoodle but ran into an error
> >
> >My pacemaker configuration is (read back out it looks the same):
> >
> >primitive
11 matches
Mail list logo
