On 10/29/2012 08:14 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Option 3 is where things are headed, however the only distro that ships it
> today is Fedora-17 (and shortly 18).
> In this scenario, all components obtain membership and quorum directly from
> corosync.
> So far OCFS2 is the only component that ha
On 02/11/12 13:07 -0500, Andrew Martin wrote:
Hi Angus,
Corosync died again while using libqb 0.14.3. Here is the coredump from today:
http://sources.xes-inc.com/downloads/corosync.nov2.coredump
# corosync -f
notice [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine ('2.1.0'): started and ready to provide
ser
Hi Angus,
Corosync died again while using libqb 0.14.3. Here is the coredump from today:
http://sources.xes-inc.com/downloads/corosync.nov2.coredump
# corosync -f
notice [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine ('2.1.0'): started and ready to provide
service.
info [MAIN ] Corosync built-in features: p
Thanks, I'll read this.
On 02/11/12 10:23, Denny Schierz wrote:
Am 02.11.2012 um 09:06 schrieb Andrew:
Hi.
Thanks for config, but is there a possibility to avoid DRBD usage for postgres?
DB on top of DRBD may be broken if master fails at DB write (because write
isn't atomic process).
yes,
Am 02.11.2012 um 09:06 schrieb Andrew :
> Hi.
> Thanks for config, but is there a possibility to avoid DRBD usage for
> postgres? DB on top of DRBD may be broken if master fails at DB write
> (because write isn't atomic process).
yes, there is a way: replication. You can use replication for P
Hi.
Thanks for config, but is there a possibility to avoid DRBD usage for
postgres? DB on top of DRBD may be broken if master fails at DB write
(because write isn't atomic process).
On 01/11/12 23:40, Denny Schierz wrote:
hi,
one example config from my testcases:
=
primitive
On 02/11/12 01:02, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Andrew wrote:
On 01/11/12 03:02, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Andrew wrote:
Hi all.
I try to build 1+1 MySQL HA cluster, and currently I'm looking on Percona
replication manager; other variant
02.11.2012 02:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
> wrote:
>> 01.11.2012 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> ...
One remark about that - it requires that gfs2 communicates with dlm in
the kernel space - so gfs_controld is not longer required.