Hi Andrew,
I confirmed it. Thanks.
Kazunori INOUE
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:58 PM
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Please add pcmk__timeout parameter to
> stonithd m
Hi, Jiaju
Thank you for reply!
2013/2/12 Jiaju Zhang :
> Hi Yusuke,
>
> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:08 +0900, yusuke iida wrote:
>> Hi, Jiaju
>>
>> Could you please reply to this message?
>
> My suggestion is no need to add additional configuration options, in
> this case, the behavior of booth is d
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Ron Kerry wrote:
> I am not sure if this is an appropriate question for a community forum since
> it is a RHEL specific question. However, I cannot think of a better forum to
> use (as someone coming from a heavy SLES background), so I will ask it
> anyway. Feel f
I am not sure if this is an appropriate question for a community forum since it is a RHEL specific
question. However, I cannot think of a better forum to use (as someone coming from a heavy SLES
background), so I will ask it anyway. Feel free to shoot me down or point me in a different direction.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Andrew Martin wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Andrew Beekhof"
>> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 10:52:23 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Reason for cluster resource migration
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Beekhof"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 10:52:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Reason for cluster resource migration
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Andrew Martin
> wrote:
> > - Original Mes
- Original Message -
> From: "Ante Karamatic"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 1:53:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Reason for cluster resource migration
>
> On 13.02.2013 05:57, Andrew Beekhof wrote::
>
> > This link has some useful info:
> >
>
Am 06.02.2013 00:00, schrieb Jake Smith:
- Original Message -
From: "Jürgen Herrmann"
To: "Jake Smith" , "The Pacemaker cluster
resource manager"
Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 4:00:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Dual primary drbd resouce not promoted on
one host
Am 05.02.2013 16
Hi,
as far as I understood from the documentation, the booth-arbitrator is not part
of any cluster-site, and just responsible for communicationg with the other
sites.
However, in my test-setup (2 sites, 1 arbitrator) I figured out that also the
arbitrator tries to run the crm_ticket - command:
Hi Andrew,
Yes, please see attached pacemaker.conf. It controls only pacemakerd.
Furthermore, I'm examining pacemaker-corosync.conf (it's a prototype) which
also controls corosync now.
This job starts corosync service before starting of pacemakerd, and stops
corosync service after the stop of pac
10 matches
Mail list logo