On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:46:40AM +0100, Rasto Levrinc wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Ron Kerry wrote:
> I am not sure if this is an appropriate question for a community
> forum
> > since
> it is a RHEL specific question. However, I cannot think of a better
> >
> forum to
> use
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:46:40AM +0100, Rasto Levrinc wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Ron Kerry wrote:
> I am not sure if this is an appropriate question for a community
> forum
> > since
> it is a RHEL specific question. However, I cannot think of a better >
> forum to
> use (as s
- Original Message -
> From: "Ante Karamatić"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 3:57:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Reason for cluster resource migration
>
> On 13.02.2013 16:27, Andrew Martin wrote::
>
> > Unfortunately the pacemaker and corosync
:-) Nice
2013/2/15 Cristiane França
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> Thank you very much!
> I changed my pacemaker config as you suggested and the problem was solved.
>
> Thanks.
> Cristiane
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:38 PM, emmanuel segura wrote:
>
>> Hello Cristiane
>>
>> You need to change your pacema
On 2013-02-15T13:56:18, Michael Wagner wrote:
> What I´m now trying to achieve is, that also in case a resource fails (and
> can´t be restarted) on one site, the ticket should be revoked from this site,
> and granted to the other. (I.e. also a fail-over in case of issues with
> single resource
Hi,
I am currently working on a geo-redundant setup with two sites and one
arbitrator, using booth as ticket manager.
In case of network-outages, or a whole site is down, booth correctly grants the
ticket to the other site (where pacemaker then starts all dependent resources).
What I´m now try
Dear all,
apologies if this is the wrong list. I posted this question on linux-ha
but did not receive a response yet.
I would appreciate it very much if somebody would share his experiences
with ubuntu packages of pacemaker in combination with clvm (possibly on
top of iSCSI)
Thanks a lot,