Hi,
in the german IT newspaper Linux-Magazin 2/13 was an article, which says that
the future of DLM (Distributed Lock Manager) is unclear.
I'd like to create a HA cluster with two nodes, accessing concurrently one FC
SAN with OCFS2. I need DLM.
I wonder that the future is unclear because,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:39:52AM +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Donald Stahl d...@blacksun.org wrote:
No.
[quote]
If you say colocate A with B and there is nowhere B is allowed to
run, then A wont be allowed to run either.
But once the cluster has
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:42:38PM +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
Hi,
in the german IT newspaper Linux-Magazin 2/13 was an article, which
says that the future of DLM (Distributed Lock Manager) is unclear.
I'd like to create a HA cluster with two nodes, accessing concurrently
one FC SAN
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:48:58AM +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca
wrote:
I wonder what happens in the case of two racing crm commands that want
to update the CIB (with non-overlapping/conflicting data). Is there any
Bad? Choice? What is there for crmsh to choose? This is what is
produced:
rsc_colocation id=s1 score=INFINITY
resource_set id=s1-0 sequential=false
resource_ref id=d1/
resource_ref id=d2/
/resource_set
/rsc_colocation
It does produces the
- Original Message -
From: Donald Stahl d...@blacksun.org
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:52:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Dependency Trees
Bad? Choice? What is there for crmsh to choose? This is what
A little roundabout but you could create a dummy resource and make all the
resource colocate with it. Then as long as you don't stop the dummy each of
the other resources could stop/start independent of each other i.e.:
colocation myset inf: ( app1 app2 app3 app4 )
On 13-02-25 10:30 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Before doing replace, crmsh queries the CIB and checks if the
epoch was modified in the meantime.
But doesn't take out a lock of any sort to prevent an update in the
meanwhile, right?
Those operations are not
atomic, though.
Indeed.
Perhaps
Greetings,
I am setting up a fail-over cluster for the first time. In the process
of following the documentation: Cluster from Scratch, I am having
difficulties understanding the DRBD configuration and procedure. The
purpose of the cluster is to provide: mail, dns, nis, syslong, and web
(wiki and
On 02/25/2013 03:27 PM, Omar Quijano wrote:
Greetings,
I am setting up a fail-over cluster for the first time. In the process
of following the documentation: Cluster from Scratch, I am having
difficulties understanding the DRBD configuration and procedure. The
purpose of the cluster is to
- Original Message -
From: Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@oddbit.com
To: Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
Cc: pacema...@clusterlabs.org, The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Problems
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca wrote:
On 13-02-24 07:56 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Basically yes.
Stonith is the first stage of recovery and supposed to be at least
vaguely reliable.
Have you figured out why fencing is so broken?
It wasn't really
I have much more familiarity with the crmsh so I apologize if I am just not seeing something that is
obvious. I am currently working from a RHEL 6.4 system with the accompanying HA addon including
pacemaker and pcs from that addon.
pcs-0.9.26-10.el6.noarch
I can find no way to display or
13 matches
Mail list logo
