On 2013-03-07T21:34:47, Vladimir m...@foomx.de wrote:
All resources are only able to run if they are distributed in the right
combination. A working example could like:
The algorithm is somewhat simplistic, which has the advantage of being
fast. It works quite well in scenarios where there's a
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 11:05:01 +0100
Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-03-07T21:34:47, Vladimir m...@foomx.de wrote:
All resources are only able to run if they are distributed in the
right combination. A working example could like:
The algorithm is somewhat simplistic, which
On 2013-03-08T11:59:33, Vladimir m...@foomx.de wrote:
Collocations were exactly what I try to avoid. The setup is planned to
get 15 resources (and an upper limit is not defined). I think it would
get pretty hard to consider all possible collocations, especially if a
kind of automated
Hi Hideo-san,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:18:09AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Dejan,
The problem was settled with your patch.
However, I have a question.
I want to use resource_set which Mr. Andrew proposed, but do not understand
a method to use with crm shell.
I read
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 12:08:05 +0100
Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-03-08T11:59:33, Vladimir m...@foomx.de wrote:
Collocations were exactly what I try to avoid. The setup is planned
to get 15 resources (and an upper limit is not defined). I think
it would get pretty hard to
Hi,
My cluster is presenting error on startup of the service postgresql because
this service is being initialized before mounting the partition /sistema.
How can I configure Pacemaker to start the Postgresql only after mounting
the partition /sistema?
My server configuration:
primitive
On 2013-03-08T17:43:54, Vladimir m...@foomx.de wrote:
I already had to work around utilization by defining utilization for
the first resource in the Resource Group. Defining utilization for
Resource Groups didn't work for me. Furthermore I can remember that
there were also problems by
Hi Emmanuel,
Thank you!
Cristiane.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:55 PM, emmanuel segura emi2f...@gmail.com wrote:
You need a order constrain
order fs_after_ms inf: drbd_sistema:promote sistema_fs:start
order pgsql_afterLfs inf: sistema_fs postgresql
Or maybe you can put fs and pgsql in a
Hi,
I have a problem when one of the server cluster starts.
How do I remove a preferential location of a service?
I want to remove these two configurations shown below:
...
rsc_location id=cli-prefer-home_fs rsc=home_fs
rule id=cli-prefer-rule-home_fs score=INFINITY
Am Freitag, 8. März 2013, 16:37:26 schrieb Cristiane França:
Hi,
I have a problem when one of the server cluster starts.
How do I remove a preferential location of a service?
I want to remove these two configurations shown below:
...
rsc_location id=cli-prefer-home_fs rsc=home_fs
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 19:48:11 +0100
Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
What are your experience? Is it possible to combine Resource Groups
and colocations? Or do I have to give up Resource Groups when using
colocations? If so I maybe have to restructure my resource setup to
colocations
Andrew,
Thanks for the feedback to my earlier questions from March 6th. I've done some
further investigation wrt the timing of what I'd call the simple failover
case: where an SSID that is master on the DC node is killed, and it takes
10-12 seconds before the slave SSID on the other node
12 matches
Mail list logo
